Compras Nikon Bluetooth |
Thus, unless you yourself do not have a mastery of physics and biochemistry, and a knowledge of the works of many Nobel Prize winner and other brillant biochemists you will not have a full appreciation for this quick twenty to thirty minute telegram lecture.
This is apparent by one of the reviewers rant and raving about static electricity. Well the truth is static electricity is a surface phenomenon of insulators. Biological systems are aqueous and water ionizes. The water molecule H2O dissociates into a positive charged H+ ion and negatively charged OH- ion. The free proton, H+, then binds to a water molecule forming a hydronium ion H3O+. The product of the concentration of [H3O+] ions and [OH-] (bracket signify concentration) ions is a constant called the ionic product of water Kw which is 10-7 mol L-1 at 25 degees C . The concentrations of the [H+] (for brevity the H2O is dropped) ion and the [OH-] ion are rarely equal. In other words, there is an electrical charge imbalance. The Danish chemist S. P. L. Sorensen defined pH (potentia Hydrogenii) as pH = -log10[H+] which is commonly measured with litmus paper. This in short measures the electrical charge imbalance (acidity) in biological solutions.
In short, some of the comments of the reviewers about static electricity, electron rich foods does not pass the litmus test.
And as far as the clinical double blind trials popular with American Medical Association most of it is witch craft compared to Rosenfled well designed scientific studies with flax oil. The probability of learning anything significant using statically studies with over 500 variables when the investigator does not even have a clue to the root variables is lubricous. It proves nothing. Some of these medical investigators are the ones that had a blank look on their face the second day of biochemistry 101 when you throw up the second law of thermodynamics and calculate the entropy of a biological chemical equation to see if it is spontaneous.
It is very sad that when Dr. Budwig recently passed away that a library that can never be replaced burn.
One of the biggest pieces of nonsense is the promotion of "electron-rich foods." All matter has the same amount of electrons as it does protons, otherwise it would carry a static electric charge.
"It is the human being, with his gradual concentration of electrons, ever striving towards the future, who conceals within himself the greatest potential for the sun's energy on earth."
A way to get a gradual concentration of electrons is to shuffle your shoes against a carpet when the weather is dry. That will generally cause a small accumulation of electrons unbalanced by protons. When you get close enough to a conductor such a doorknob or another person there is a shock as the excess electrons jump to the body with the lesser excess charge. Imagine a larger "concentration of electrons."
"Thus, the human who eats refined foodstuffs or food which lacks electron...."
No food could lack electrons, that is physically impossible. It can't even have a relative lack of electrons, or it would be electrically charged, like static cling from the dryer, or worse.
Her characterization of all cancer is patently false: "the only substance which characterised the cancerous cells, as opposed to healthy ones, was isolated fat; the formation of fat in the cell nucleus, cell body and cytoplasm. It was the single distinguishing feature of cancerous cells in contrast to healthy ones."
That is certainly not accepted today. Cancer is much more complicated than that. You can read more information at the NCI site cancer.gov.
I do sympathize with those who are desperate for help. But the whole theory that this book is based on is utter nonsense. The late Dr. Budwig seems to have believed in her theory, but there have been no controlled studies, even retrospective studies, looking at groups of patients who either did or did not go on the Budwig diet. I can't say the diet is nonsense, but the ideas behind it certainly are.
As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not
certain, and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.
-- Albert Einstein
Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves
up and hurry off as if nothing had happened.
-- Winston Churchill