1 Superb film about Britain, India, and the man in between.
Notwithstanding his having been a great man, Gandhi is not necessarily an example for our times. This is a beautifully made film; one of the most moving ever made, but not for its perceived "Lessons". Rather, this film is great for what makes any film great: wonderful acting (phenomenal on Mr. Kingsley's part), skilled direction, great camera cinematography, lighting, editing, and pace. The sceenplay and story, of course, are highly contributory herein, but even were this fiction the film would still qualify as a great film. It is simply a great film however you look at it. You needn't read too much into this film to enjoy it; or see in Gandhi's example, say, a panacea of sorts for our world of today. Passive non-violent resistance worked for Gandhi first in South Africa (to some extent) and then India mostly because his adversary was a civilized one. Gandhi, let's remember, basically used British law against the British themselves. He was able to succeed not simply because his cause was noble and/or because passive resistance is inherently effective. I grant you that his campaign was a brilliant one, skillfully engineered; but against most any other country save Britain, it would have only "ended before it began," as former Soviet dissident Natan Sharansky says in his book "The Case for Democracy"; most likely in Gandhi's death or disappearance. Disregarding some fellow reviewers herein, do you honestly think a Gandhi would have had any chance resisting the likes of a Kaiser Wilhelm, Lenin, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin or even a Mugabe, Duvailier or Hussein? (How long do you think, to modernize this issue, would the Dalai Lama remain free were he to land in Tibet and attempt to lead a campaign of non-violent resistance against Red China?) I have read Gandhi's autobiography and I give him his just due. I'm just saying that Imperial Britain's historic traditions and norms of behavior had an important role herein as well, and this ought be recognized (and no, I'm not British myself). Gandhi is an example in one way (and maybe we'll see the likes of another Gandhi somewhere, someday), but "His Example" isn't one we should deceive ourselves as being applicable across the board within the chaotic world in which we live. In short, this film is a superb treatment of an important historical episode (particular to a rather specific period and set of circumstances) and, as such, well worth your time viewing. Cheers!
2 excellent and extraordinary
Excellent movie about an extraordinary man. I was surprised to learn that Gandhi incorporated the teachings of Jesus Christ into his belief system. He successfully freed India of England's rule without ever lifting a sword or firing a gun. Just amazing!
3 Historically inaccurate
Before i begin i must profess that i am from Pakistan. The low rating of this review is not based on that fact. I have the utmost respect for Mr. Gandhi; he was a very noble man indeed and did not allow the question of ethnicity or ideology hinder his preachings. In this movie "Gandhi"; Mr. Jinnah has been incorrectly protrayed as an irresponsible; shabbily attired confused leader. Hardly the characteristic of a leader who created a nation without firing a bullet. It is a well documented fact that Mr. Jinnah was an impressionable speaker and immaculate in his attire. In his dealings Mr. Jinnah is known to be very noble and just.
Richard Attenborough does immense injustice to this fact and in doing so does a great dis-service in setting an unbiased and impartial portryal of characters of the time. It is to this fact and this fact alone i give this DVD a low score.
4 Amazing Acting. Amazing Direction. Amazing Story.
WOW! That's an understatement to describe this movie. Ben Kingsley is more than amazing. The man is spectacular and he truly deserved the Oscar that he won. He IS Gandhi. Whenever I read or think of Gandhi, I think of Ben's Gandhi for he helps me personify and personalize who Gandhi was by putting on a face on the Mahatma for those of us who would never know him. No movie can of course cover everything about a person, particularly a man as dynamic and mesmerizing as Gandhi but this film comes very close to covering every significant thing that had occurred in his life span. History and biography buffs MUST watch this movie. Richard Attenborough does an amazing job with this movie. The cinematography is beautiful.
5 Important Movie about an Important Man
The life of Gahndi should not be forgotten. The acting in this movie is perfect and the messege and life of Gahndi comes through strong and clear in this brilliant piece of cinema magic.
This movie should be played in every school. Every man, woman and child should see this movie.
6 Great Entertainment: Better Teaching Tool
I do not need to elaborate on what a great quality film this is. It has the awards to prove it. Neither do I need to comment on the quality of Gandhi, the man.
BUT I HAVE A GREAT IDEA!
I just watched this film with my Jr. High aged daughter. What an opportunity to show the next generation a hero that changed the world WITHOUT violence!
Don't waste this opportunity. Show this movie to a young person and take time to talk with them about it. My daughter and I got on the web and researched Gandhi's life. The pictures we saw looked much like portions of the movie.
This is certainly a cut above the films we normally watch.
7 A most remarkable life
"Gandhi" is an amazing movie about an amazing man. Through out his entire life he preached non-violent, civil disobiedince in order to fight colonialization by The British Empire. He preached peace even in the face cruel beatings from British soldiers, two World Wars, and even when facing civil war between Indian Hindus and Muslims (which sparked the fued between India and Pakistan that exists today). Ben Kingsley heads an excellent cast (including Candice Burgan, Martin Sheen, Edward Fox, ect.) as Gandhi throughout some odd 45 years of his life from Africa to India. The make-up to age Kingsley is wonderfully subtle, I admire the job. Richard Attenborough did a marvelous job of balenceing the wide picture, more epic aspects of the script (the politics that Gandhi was involved in) with the personal story (like with his wife and his best friends). If anything else, watch this movie just for the facinating history it tells. I realize that I am being too short with such a fine movie as this is, but "Gandhi" is a movie I can not tell you about, you have to watch it and take from it what you will.
8 Fantastic, but might have been better without Ben Kingsley
Oh, don't get me wrong, Ben Kingsley was FANTASTIC as Gandhi! He totally deserved his Oscar. Still, a little known fact is that Ben Kingsley wasn't the movie company's first choice to play Gandhi. Do you know who their first choice was?
Charles Nelson Reilly.
That's right - Charles Nelson Reilly, the beloved star of Match Game. Apparently the producers of Gandhi desperately wanted Charles to star as Gandhi, but he was already committed to play Don Don Canneloni in Cannonball Run 2. He couldn't get out of it, so they went with Ben Kingsley instead.
Oh, they made a good second choice. The movie is still wonderful as it is. Still, I can't help but wonder how much more wonderful it might have been if Charles Nelson Reilly had starred in it.
Granted, Cannonball Run 2 probably wouldn't have been the classic it is without Charles, but just imagine what Charles could have done as Gandhi! No offense to Ben Kingsley (like I said, he was great) but this movie would have been totally different if it had starred Charles Nelson Reilly.
It's still a 4 star movie...but it could have been a 5 star movie.
9 AN AWESOME MOVIE !
"Gandhi" is superb....Attenborough's multiple Oscar winner; including the Best Picture, Best Director, Cinematography, Costume Design, Art Direction, Film Editing, Screenplay, and Best Actor. Ben Kingsley realistically performs as Mohandas K. Gandhi who was a man who made humility and truth more powerful than empires.
However, the biased portrayal of Muhammad Ali Jinnah as a Muslim leader who wanted a separate homeland only for his own political aggrandizement, is quite disappointing. Jinnah's claim that the Muslim League represented the Muslims of India was substantiated in 1946, when in the elections for the Indian constituent assembly, Muslim League won all the seats assigned to the Muslim electorate. In truth, Jinnah was a brilliant man with great intellect, iron-will, eloquence and perseverance; a man with total integrity as quoted in a contemporary Time magazine.
Regardless the crap done about Jinnah, this movie is worth-seeing. For those who are interested in the history of sub-continent, "Gandhi" and "Jinnah", both are useful resources about the independence of colonial India from the British rule.
10 A Movie To Transend Time
Just as Mahatma Gandhi's teachings will always live on in the heart and minds of all humans, so should this movie withstand the test of cinematic time. For those who have no other resources, this movie is also a standing testament to Gandhi's real legacy. First of all, Ben Kingsley, who plays Gandhi, does the best job portraying a historical figure on screen than anyone else I have ever seen. True, Jamie Foxx portrayed Ray Charles really well in the recent Ray, but the eyes are always what differs an actor from the subject, whereas Foxx was always wearing sunglasses. Here, Ben Kingsley not only portrays the eyes, but the walk, the voice, the look, even the squiggly vein on the side of his head that both he and Gandhi share. Second, this is one of the best epic movies ever made. More extras were used in this film than any other is history (of course before digital multiplication of extras) because of the willingness of the Indian people to re-enact their patron's life. The movie has a grand scale and teaches us all the meaning of peace and non-violence, just as Gandhi would have us do. Richard Attenborough has captured the essence of India pre-independence and shown us not only the hostility but the humanity of the British without totally turning them into monsters, as Gandhi did not see them that way. Everyone should see this movie, everyone.
11 History at its best
Although one person's view, this movie highlights Mohandas K. Gandhi's life and shows what struggles both India and Pakistan went through before their independences and how Gandhi was one man whose drive made it all happen. Stellar performances by both Ben Kingsley as well as Roshan Seth (who shows a remarkable resemblance to) and takes on the role of Jawaharlal Nehru. On the long side (at three hours+), but still definitely worth watching and adding to your collection.
12 "We must become the change we want to see..."
"...in the world."-Mahatma Gandhi
This past 9-11, I went to a small memorial service in my neighborhood at a congregation, non-christian, which was very moving, reflective not war-rallying and this quote of Gandhi's was on the one page flyer containing the order of the service. I had to think upon this quote for a while, and then I realized that what he was really describing was the new birth Christ talks about in John 3. Gandhi studied all religions and in his way was inspired by Christ's teachings and life. To conquer the darker side of our psyches, we must exercise the good side, and by that good example influence others. Violence only breeds more violence. Coercion only breeds discontent.
Today is Gandhi's birthday, October 2, my birthday too. I was fascinated with him as a young girl, remember reading in the dictionary that he was a great spiritual leader, remember thinking what one sentence would describe my life, would it be as remarkable? Given the violence that continues throughout the world, it seems important to reflect on his life, his philosophy. Gandhi was a devout Hindu; his given name Mohandas was changed to Mahatma which means in English great soul. I got this quote from today's Times of India:
"Today, when we hear the term 9/11, we think instantly of September 11, 2001 - a day that unleashed a cycle of death and destruction that still continues. But the date has a different significance for Indians...On September 11, 1906, Mahatma Gandhi launched the first non-violent campaign the world had seen, in Johannesburg, South Africa. He initiated a movement against the Natal government's effort to disenfranchise Indians, by proposing the unprecedented course of meeting violence with non-violence." The writer of this article urges others to get involved in continuing Gandhi's program of "non-violent defense", to not just reflect on his life, but put that program into practice.
I love this movie. It documents his entire life, and there are so many memorable scenes. It's an excellent movie all around, the acting, directing, filming. A MUST SEE.
13 Basic Introduction to Achieving World Peace
Edit: The core point below is that clashes of millions of adherents of different religions, i.e. Catholic versus everyone else, Muslim versus Hindu, are not new, and the past does indeed demonstrate that force of arms is an ineffective means--indeed a pathological means that makes it worse--for addressing such schisms. Gandhi, and Gandhi alone, has shown the way with proven success at the level of Nations and Peoples.
9-11 focused some of us, but not enough of us, on the monumental issues of war and peace such as have not occurred since World War II--the Cold War being, as Derek Leebaert documents so well in "The Fifty Year Wound", a false war, one with enormous costs to all mankind.
I bought this video recently--having seen it many years ago--to refresh my memory on the essence of Gandhi and his proven concept of non-violent resistance. The DVD capped several years of reading in the non-fiction national security arena (see my other 470+ reviews on war and peace), and has proven to be the ultimate primer as well as the ultimate Master's Seminar.
This is the movie to watch if you want to get down to fundamentals; Gandhi's three basic lessons of war and peace as shown so beautifully here are these: 1) the only devils are in our own minds; 2) the separation of Pakistan and India, like the separation of Palestine and Israel, violated the civil order between Muslims and Hindus, and destroyed all that Gandhi had achieved: peaceful coexistence of peoples within a single nation; and 3) in the end, after great pain, truth and love inevitably triumph.
Although I was tempted to fast-forward to the current six-front 100-year war between radicalized Islam and militarized America on the one hand, and between impoverished billions and corporate America on the other, I paused to reflect on the past first. It was the Spanish who first committed genocide against the American Indians, who expelled the Muslims and then the Jews, who sponsored the Inquisition and the Crusades. It was the British who stupidly pitted Muslim against Hindu in their attempts to assert their imperial will--nothing makes them look as stupid as the movie's coverage of how the "Empire" forbade the locals to take salt from their very own sea: the Indian Sea.
Now I fast forward to our current circumstances, with special reference to Jonathan Schell's "Unconquerable World," perhaps complemented by Clyde Prestowitz' "Rogue Nation" (the US), and Chalmers Johnson "Sorrows of Empire"--and the other 470+ books relevant to war and peace today. Bottom line: boy, have we screwed this up. First off, invading Afghanistan made Al Qaeda stronger, not weaker. Second off, invading Iraq has made America weaker, not stronger, and inflamed the Middle East, Central Asia, Eastern Africa, the Pacific Rim, and the Muslim populations in the Americas.
We need a Gandhi. I cannot think of any modern leader who is even close, although the current Pope has certainly tried. This movie depicts, in terms stark and relevant, the opposite of 9-11--the clash of mobs driven by ideology or religion, completely oblivious to the core facts that Gandhi tried to teach: non-violence, love, truth, the Golden Rule. All else is evil.
If you have time for just one serious DVD, this is it.
14 Outrage at Several (Stupid?) Comments
I can't believe what some people think.
I understand that we all have our own personal opinion, but earlier in the reviews someone likened Mahatma Gandhi, nonviolent peace and freedom fighter, to an anorexic Paris Hilton. That is impossible for me to understand. Just how are Paris Hilton and Gandhi alike?
Additionally, that review also stated that Gandhi had no point. Hmm, let's see. What happened as a result of Gandhi's fasting and walk to the sea? Freedom for the entire Indian subcontinent! I can understand criticism of the cinematography, photography, and other details (which in this movie were excellent), but I can't grasp the reviewer's point. Perhaps freedom for an entire subcontinent is only as important as racy entertainment (if not less important). Only Time will tell.
-Concerned Observer
15 An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind.
Richard Attenborough's "Gandhi" is on the short-list of great cinematic biographies. This depiction of one of the most important political figures of the last century is not only an inspiring tale but also a dazzling and triumphant filmmaking accomplishment.
London-educated lawyer Mohandas K. Gandhi (Ben Kingsley) experiences discrimination first-hand while in South Africa. In response, he organizes a passive resistance campaign against the government. His actions come to the attention of important figures in India who seek Gandhi's help in freeing their country from British rule. The march toward independence is slow as there is difficulty in convincing the Hindus and Muslims to work together for a common cause. However, Gandhi manages to maintain the peace and keep everyone united. His efforts eventually pay off as India succeeds in breaking free from its colonial status.
"Gandhi" is a mesmerizing film primarily because of Kingsley's uncanny performance. It is eerie to see an actor so perfectly recreate a historical figure on-screen. Kingsley is literally perfect in his role and essentially becomes Gandhi for the duration of the picture. He not only delivers one of the greatest performances of the Eighties but one of the greatest performances in the history of film. The supporting cast also is wonderful with Rohini Hattangady a particular standout as Gandhi's wife. Oftentimes a life story can become dull and dreary when chronicled on the big screen but Attenborough manages to hold your interest for the entire 188 minute running time. That's a tribute to both the director's talent and the fascinating life that the real Gandhi led.
16 A great film
This is a great film which gives us a good portrayal of Gandhi's life and achievements.
The film portrays Gandhi as an honest, hard working and kind individual who always tried to do the right thing, even when facing overwelming resistance.
If you like the film I would suggest reading his autobiography The Story of My Experiments with Truth, which will give you an insight into his mind, and the website www.feeltheforce.org.
17 A soul-conquering fine work of art
Never before have I seen such a powerful work of art. It made me forget the finesse of the technological masterpiece, an advanced Macintosh computer running MacOsX, which delivered the breath-taking scenes in vibrant colors with soul-stirring sound effects. Instead all that stood in my mind was the movie and movie alone. This was a radical change in thought for a person like me who is a avid technology enthusiast. Never before have I been so involved in the scenes of a movie. Every scene and every peice of sound hits the nail right on its head with a powerful strike of the hammer. I must appreciate the dedication of the team and their quest for perfection. Years of their work has produced this masterpiece which mankind can cherish for the eons to come. This certainly is one of the best creations of collective human intellect of superlative degree. The story of the life of a great soul in a soul-conquering work of art.
18 This movie delivers the " goods ".
I have seen this movie about 6 times and each time I do feel a deeper appreciation for it. This movie is a master piece filled with great acting, strong dialogue, great shot locations, film direction, editing, and much more. To refer to this film as anything but a master piece would be incorrect. This in my opinon is the best movie ever made. I don't say that lightly because I have seen great works of art such as Godfather one and two, Roman Holiday, look who's coming to dinner, casablanca and ordinary people. I am also under the distinct impression that of all movies i have seen the best opening to any movie is Ghandi. Over 400,000 extras were in the first scene paying homage to Ghandi as his dead body lay covered in roses. They even quote one of the most brilliant minds ( Einstein ) as of having said something to the extent that " Generations from now man will struggle to believe a man such as Ghandie walked the face of the earth" or something like that. GREAT FILM!
19 One of my favorite movies
I loved this movie about this holy saint. His movement of "soul force" has been the inspiriation for non-violent social protests for decades. I loved that the wit and humor that he portrayed in his books was not lost in this movie!
20 Great Despliction of an Unbelievable Man
"Gandhi", starring Ben Kingsley, is a wonderful journey through the life and times of civil rights leader Mahatma Gandhi. In 1982, it earned nine Oscars, including Best Picture and Best Director. The hardword spent on this project is rare for cinema. The twenty years spent on production paid off greatly. Director Richard Attenborough led the cast and crew wonderfully to complete one of the greatest films within the last thirty years. This has been rightfully hailed by many critics as one of the Top 100 Greatest Films of all time.
The plot is brilliant. It wonderfully desplicts the life and times of this unbelievable man. The previous heavy research is obvious as they wrote according to Gandhi's words. It accurately desplicts Gandhi's beliefs, morals, and struggles. The chain of events leading to India's independence stay intact. It also wonderfully educates audiences about the wars and the fight for equal rights. The emotional value stays at its top throughout the entire three-hour film. Such difficult task couldn't have been accomplished better. Every word forces audiences to feel every characters' turmoil and struggle.
The environment accurately desplicts early 1900's India. The elaborate surroundings could lead audiences to mistake it for real-life living. The beauty and the ugliness are created wonderfully by make-up. They amazingly make Ben Kingsey almost resemble the real-life Mahatma Gandhi, regardless of desplicted age. The characters' aging processes and the fighting aftermaths are brilliantly crafted. The wardrobes accurately desplict the styles of the times and of what Ghandi wore. They amazingly maintained this through every character...an estimated 300,000 people.
Ben Kinsley won an Oscar for Best Actor for his portrayal of Mahatma Gandhi. His own emotional value shows greatly throughout the film, namely loss, hunger, struggle, and victimization. His actions and speech patterns accurately desplict that of the actual ones. He amazingly maintained his character throught the ages. Therefore, it's not just the resemblence that makes Kingley so amazing as an actor. All other actors also perform their roles wonderfully: Martin Sheen, Candice Bergen, and others.
"Gandhi" is great for those looking for a great quality film. This is sure to continue pleasing audiences as it has since its release. This is rightfully destined to be a classic in the upcoming years.
21 The Greatest Performance of the 20th Ca.
Should the Academy of Motion Pictures ever choose to select the greatest films and performances of the 20th ca, I'm fairly certain "Gandhi" would be in the top 5 Best Movie nominees; but there is no doubt Ben Kingsley would win for Best Actor.
Kingsley would not win based on his acting ability alone, although few (if any) in the industry's history have been better. Richard Attenborough was clearly a driving force, a superb filmmaker who spent decades crafting and refining this movie. Another force was the Indian people themselves, who become enraptured with Kingsley, lending believability to the speeches and funeral scene and enhancing Kingsley's performance. But the greatest credit clearly goes to Gandhi himself, whose meditations upon Hindi and Christian and Islamic principles crafted a philosophy of non-violent non-cooperation that brought about the peaceful independence of all Southeast Asia and prevented civil war.
When you bring talent like Kingsley's and Attenborough's together with the content of Gandhi's life, you cannot help but have a masterpiece.
Kingsley is the lynchpin to this movie. Beyond his visual resemblance to Gandhi, the physical movements, the subtle tonal inflections, and beyond the incredible range of emotion and passion Kingsley brings to the screen, his portrayal of Gandhi through 5 distinct phases in his life are what make his performance monumental.
We start with Gandhi a young man, mid 20's, working as a lawyer in South Africa. He is treated unfairly and thrown off a train (in retrospect, one of the biggest blunders ever made by the British Empire). The first phase, then, is the young lawyer outraged at injustice, unclear how to direct his outrage but with a firm moral base. As the film progress in South Africa, we see Gandhi become a strong leader, with the principles of non-violence resistance taking form and outrage directed against specific unjust laws. Here the young Gandhi is a man of outward passion.
Gandhi accomplishes his goals in South Africa and returns to India. The Indian Congress sees him as a potential leader, but Gandhi is unsure about the innate morality of independence. Under the recommendation of Gokale, he travels throughout India and observes the injustice to the masses, not just by the English but by radical and violent Indians themselves. He gives his first powerful speech to Congress, chastising them for not understanding the plight of the masses. Here begins the second phase - the fight for independence not for political reasons, but for moral reasons. His outrage is directed at the general injustice of foreign rule, not simply one law. Again fiery, his passion is redirected against injustice in general, and he begins general campaigns against British industry.
His first major crises occurs when violence erupts, killing 21 policemen. Gandhi realizes that independence can only come about if dignity and self-determination are restored to the people, and that violence restores neither. So where almost surely independence would have come to India 20 years earlier than it eventually did, Gandhi stops the campaign. He is immediately arrested.
Upon release, Gandhi looks inward to realize that nonviolent acts directed against something does not in itself restore dignity, but upon the restoration of dignity people will non-violently refuse to be treated unjustly. Gandhi marches to the sea, where he encourages the masses to make salt in direct violation of British law. The British are powerless - the Indians will not fight, they will not capitulate, they will not cooperate, and the government falls to pieces around them. This is the third phase - the fire is turned inward with the realization that the fight is not against a foreign power, but to restore dignity within ourselves.
Independence comes, but at a price. While the masses maintained nonviolence in their struggle against the British, it proved impossible to maintain against the deepest religious fears and bigotries. Violence erupts, thousands die. Greater India splits between India and Pakistan, and the nations teeter on all-out war. Here is the brief fourth phase: That all he had accomplished was meaningless. The fire is gone from Gandhi, he is a defeated man. As he states, "I cannot stand to see the destruction of all that I have fought for."
In this horrible setback is the final transformation, where Gandhi transcends from leader and teacher to a true Saint. He begins his last fast, a fast with conviction in his principles that reverberate throughout India and Pakistan. With his fast he conveys that his principles were not just to gain independence, not just to gain the easy and desirable goals - they were the principles of God, God's Way. The fire that had burned all his life was now buried deep inside but cut like a laser in his surety of God's Law.
"Eat! I am going to Hell..." a distraught man tells him, "...but not with your death on my soul."
"Only God knows who goes to Hell." Gandhi replies.
"I KILLED A CHILD! I SMASHED HIS HEAD AGAINST A WALL!!"
"Why?"
"They killed my son. The Muslims killed my son..."
"I know a way out of Hell." Gandhi replies. "Find a small child, a little boy, whose parents have been killed, and raise him as your own....
...Only be sure he is a Muslim, and that you raise him as one..."
Gandhi's fast stops the violence and ends the civil war. In this final phase, Gandhi is no longer the leader, the fighter, the outraged. He is simply God's messenger, bringing His Way. Kingsley portrays these transformations subtly and convincingly, so that we are lost in the story of the man, forgetting we are watching the portrayal of a man. That is what makes this movie so great, and Kingsley's performance the greatest of all.
22 Greatest Movie Ever, But Kabir Is Right
Reviewer: catpole from Canada
As said before, this may be the finest film ever made. However, just reading Kabir's review further down this page I have to agree with him 100%. The fatal flaw in not in the film itself - which may be the best ever made - but in the DVD package since it was made over 20 years ago. It's a BIG Question Kabir raises, and a crucial one. Why ISN'T there equal if not greater space given to bios of the magnificent Indian actors who made this film shine when the white actors are given this basic attention?! This smacks of the discrimination Gandhi dedicated his life to. I don't blame Sheen and Co, who also put in great performances, but I DO blame the company that put the DVD together. And why isn't Hindi included along with English, both as as audio track and major subtitle when lesser known languages are? This just doesn't make sense and IS an insult to Indian people. I'm sure Attenborough, Kingsley, and Gandhi himself would disapprove (I'm a white guy by the way). I won't boycott this film because apart from these things it still carries a great message but c'mon Colombia, get with it!! Money grubbing dogs. The company might makew some amends by donating a major portion of this film's profits to, say, the Dalits, but I won't be holding my breath. In the meantime, Kabir, maybe I'll just show it to all my friends for free, free of any guilt. :) Peace.
23 The Best Film Ever Made
Hollywood take note, this is probably the best film ever made. Without a doubt it's the best of the modern era. You'd have to go back to 1939 to find such a story driven movie with acting and production values at this level. The film lives up to the man, no easy feat. I didn't even notice the three hour length. Casting directors - start chasing Kinglsey again for any role he wants, sadly he's been swept under the rug and typecast. I'm betting he can pull off any role if only given the chance. Not just Kinglsey though, ALL the actors in this were superb. The sets are utterly magnificent; the story as true as can be for a film and a very valuable history lesson to boot. I'd give it 6 stars if possible. It's THAT good. Gandhi sets the standard by which all other movies should be judged. Peace.
24 my life is my message
There is nothing I can say about this movie that hasn't already been said by previous reviewers - beyond excellence -
except
Gandhi said "my life is my message" - and the message of this film can change lives - not many films can make that claim!
25 THE WORD THAT DESCRIBES THIS MOVIE IS: BEAUTIFUL.
"Gandhi" is one of those movies where everything seems to be perfect. The main character, Mohandas K. Gandhi is one of the most important historical figures, and he deserved a movie that made justice to his legend and greatness. In 1982, Richard Attenborough made a beautiful film that without a doubt, made that thousands of people admire Mohandas K. Gandhi.
Ben Kingsley's performance is one of the most impressive that I have ever seen, thanks to a low-key and spiritual portrait of Gandhi, Ben Kingsley is now known as an excellent actor. There are few main characters, most of them are supporting characters, but the performances are equally impressive.
The cinematography is flawless: the photography, the costumes, the production design and the direction are outstanding. For those that haven't seen "Gandhi", this movie did for Mohandas K. Gandhi the same thing that "Schindler's List" did for Oskar Schindler in 1993, thanks to these movies a lot of people were interested in these historical men.
Definitely "Gandhi" is one of the best films ever made, it's a work of art, the homage that Mohandas K. Gandhi deserved.
26 Excellent movie about a 'mover' in this world
Every once in a while this world produces an exceptional human being whose presence makes it a much better place to live in. Such a person was Mahatma Gandhi; the Indian `radical' whose teachings about non-violent resistance lead to the eventual independence of India from British colonial rule. His teachings have inspired other such movements in the world and his life has been looked up to as a standard which others have tried to emulate.
Every once in a while those responsible for the academy awards have chosen deserving films. This is one of them. Ben Kingsley gives a grand performance as Gandhi, from his youth to his death. The impersonation is spot on; everything from the accent to the gait is so convincing that one could swear Kingsley was Gandhi.
If you are looking for a biography of this man on film, this movie is an excellent source. Condensing Gandhi's life into a few hours is such a great feat, especially when there is so much of this man that could be explored. The movie was filmed in India, with 300,000 extras, so if you like epic films you will definitely enjoy this one. The scenery is authentic and the characters have a reality about them so often lacking in `hollywood' films. No `eye-candy' version of a historical event, this is a real movie about a real person.
The DVD extras were ok for a film this old. There is some original newsreel footage which is quite short but still worth watching to see the real Gandhi as he was. Kingsley also gives a talk about how it was being Gandhi, there is also some of the sayings of Gandhi; great candidates for those memorable sayings we all try to memorize to motivate ourselves. All in all a great DVD, the movie is a timeless classic about a great man of the modern world.
27 Superb! Both entertaining and informative!
Ben Kingsley was an excellent choice to portray one of history's most celebrated martyrs. As with all other films of this type, a familiarity with the history of the nation and life of the central character is necessary to fully appreciate the quality of the picture. Viewing this film is like watching history come alive; everything presented here so vividly accounts for the life of the man who vigorously sought non-violent ways to obtain the independence of his country and people. Watch it, and see why it was the Motion Picture Academy's choice for Best Picture.
28 Excellent film.
I'd like to say, this film is probably one of my top 10 favorites. Very well scripted, and very well directed, same goes for the soundtrack to it as well. Though that's the only problem I have, why can't these greedy record companies re-release the soundtrack on cd for myself to spend 15-25 dollars on, instead of having to buy a used LP at some record shop and have to buy a record player for myself to be able to listen to it.
Hey, I got a message for you RIAA, why don't you re-release this score and you'll score yourself some cash of mine, and we'll both be happy, agreed? While your at it, why don't you re-release the soundtrack to 'Mobsters' as well. Maybe if these cds were available to buy, people wouldn't feel the need to download them from the internet!
Later
29 The True Epic Biopic
The night I watched this movie, I was as tired as I had ever been in my life. Unfortunately, the movie I was about to watch and not get out of was Gandhi, and it just so happened to be three hours and ten minutes long. Luckily, that was this movie's only flaw.
I recommend this movie to any breathing, living person on this planet. It may just change how you think. This movie not only perfectly captured the life of Gandhi, but it also captured the horrors of ethinic conflict and war. The entire time I was thinking about how disgusting the way white people treated "colored" people in those days was. Any movie that jolts me with this much emotion I will love. I believe that is what makes a great movie. It really captures you as if you are a fish, but you do not die and become dinner. You are thrown back after feeling the harshness of the outside world. That is exactly how I felt. And because of that, I would really consider this one of the best movies ever made.
The acting was not alone as one of the best things about this movie. Two words: Ben Kingsley. He was exactly what the movie needed. His transition from an unknown individual to a strong-willed, life-changing man is so crystal-clearly acted that you are left with amazement. Wow! That is all I have to say.
Once again, I must state my disclaimer: THREE HOURS AND TEN MINUTES LONG! Please, please don't watch this movie at night or when you're tired. And if you have to, make some coffee. You really need to keep your eyes and your hearts open.
Bottom Line: By far one of the greatest movies ever made...period! (I give it an A+)
30 History comes alive!
Anyone who has already seen "Gandhi" doesn't need me to tell them how great this movie is. Over twenty years after its initial release, it still has the power to touch viewers of all ages on a deeply emotional and personal level. That's because its basic message of love, peace, and harmony - or at least the human desire to aspire to them - is timeless and universal.
As a high-school world history teacher, this is the only full-length feature movie which I use in my classroom. For the past six years, year after year, I have watched hundreds of teenagers become fully engaged in this movie. Rarely does it occur that one of them finds nothing of value in this story.
In just a little over three hours, so much history is brought to life in "Gandhi." While individual clips can be used at various points in a modern world history curriculum, I have found the movie most valuable when it is show continuously, in its entirety, after students have already been made familiar with all of the appropriate thematic topics. "Gandhi" addresses all of the following:
1) the Apartheid system of South Africa
2) the impact of European colonialism
3) the Indian home rule movement
4) non-violent, civil disobedience
5) Hinduism and Islam (Hinduism does get much more attention)
6) the partition of India and Pakistan
When one considers the current state of affairs between India and Pakistan, the relevance of this movie to current affairs becomes unquestionable.
Over half a century after Gandhi's death, his message has continued to be an inspiration for millions, from all walks of life - from Martin Luther King Jr. to Cesar Chavez to John Lennon to the students in my class.
Sure, the movie's portrayal of the historical figure of Gandhi is not entirely historically accurate - and it's important to discuss this with any class before, during, and after a viewing of this movie. But I challenge anyone to find ANY movie which is 100% on the mark. As historical based movies go, Gandhi is as good as they come.
31 Trully inspirational
It's so comforting to know there are still values in mankind. It is so inspirational to know that there have been people who have won some of the hardest wars in peace and respect for human nature. I have rarely been touched by history as much as I have been by looking closer at Gandhi's life. If we only had more such people on earth, we can live in hope that mankind will not cease to exist. This movie will not only give you a deep sense of history but also leave you with a deep sense of humanity and humility. A trully beautifully crafted movie that pays respect to a trully great man. Great performances, excellent transfer on DVD, trully captivating and inspirational.
32 A FILM ABOUT PEACE AND HOW ONE MAN GAVE THE WORLD HOPE
I CAN'T SAY MUCH ABOUT THIS FILM, IT WAS DONE BRILLANTLY AND GAVE US A LOOK INSIDE THE MIND OF A MAN AND HIS STRUGGLE FOR PEACE. WATCH THIS FILM AS IT COMES TO LIFE, BEN KINGSLEY IS BRILLANT AS GANDHI AND FOR HIS PORTRAYL OF THIS GREAT LEADER OF PEACE HE WON THE OSCAR FOR BEST ACTOR IN TOTAL THIS PICTURE WON 9 ACADEMY AWARDS INCLUDING ''BEST PICTURE'' A FILM ABOUT ONE MAN AND HIS SEARCH FOR NON VIOLENT TACTICS. PEACE IS IN ALL OF US ---WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER FOR ONLY LOVE CAN CONQUER HATE--MARVIN GAYE
33 Awesome DVD set!!!
This DVD comes with an incredible amount of extras for a long movie. I especially enjoyed the interview with Ben Kingsley and the newsreel footage of Ghandi's travels. The audio and video quality is top notch. The package is worthy of such a great film.
I can't praise this DVD enough!
34 An interesting look at a fascinating man
I watched Sir Richard Attenborough's epic Gandhi as a child, and now that I own the DVD, I can say that I find this film as fascinating and awesome as I did back then. Ben Kingsley turns in a wonderful performance as Gandhi, the attorney-turned-activist who fought for an independent India not with weapons, but with passive resistance and words. From the Mahatma's early days as an attorney in South Africa all the way through to his assassination, Sir Ben Kingsley portrays Gandhi with such searing intensity that I sometimes felt as if I was seeing the Mahatma himself and not the actor portraying him.
I also have to give a nod here to the wonderful cast of Indian actors who appeared in the film, but most notably to Roshan Seth, who played Pandit Nehru. I have seen this versatile actor in several other films, but I think that he really shines as Nehru, Gandhi's friend and advisor. This must have been an intensely personal project for someone such as Mr. Seth, who was about 5 when the Mahatma was assassinated, and he carries himself well in the role.
The extras on this DVD were quite a good mix; I especially found the newsreel footage of Gandhi to be quite interesting. Although I was a bit troubled by the lack of a Hindi language track, I gave the DVD 5 stars because I figured it was an oversight on the studio's part that can be corrected in subsequent releases, and not something for which one can lay blame on Sir Richard Attenborough.
All in all, a great DVD that I will definitely find easy to recommend to friends and family.
35 BEN KINGSLEY'S FINEST HOUR ON DVD
Richard Attenborough's "Gandhi" is a masterfully told, massively mounted epic motion picture, depicting the life and times of Gandhi, a benevolant crusader for peace, whose shocking assassination rocked the world. Ben Kingsley rightfully took home the Oscar for his subtle but stunning transformation into the title role. WARNING: This is a slow paced movie but well worth the three hour plus investment of your time.
Columbia Tristar has given us a very beautiful print of the film. Colors are rich, bold and vibrant. Contrast levels are good. Although black levels are not always at their darkest, this is relatively forgivable, since most of the film takes place during the day. Shimmering, aliasing and edge enhancement are all present but in extremely minute amounts, leaving one with nothing to do but admire the visual presentation in all of its breathtaking cinematography. The soundtrack is 2.0 surround but well represented. Some of the audio has a tendancy to appear thin or strident but, again, considering its dated fidelity and the source material, it is remarkably well represented. No extras - disappointing for a big time Oscar winner like this. Perhaps we'll get a special edition eventually.
36 Ben Kingsley - shows us the ART of acting
If you want to learn about this Great man THIS DVD is the best
choice you could possibly make.
The movie was made so vivid,even though all the movies should have been as vivid as this one. While you watch this movie you forget completely that you are watching it from your TV.
YOU are inside the TV thanks to DVD.
Seated right beside Gandhi, walking and traveling all over with him.
You'll take and make with him, the very first steps towards freedom starting in South Africa and then heading to India.
You'll get to learn everything you wanted about Gandhi and I've proven that.
One day as I was talking to one Indian person I didn't even mentioned Gandhi when surprisingly I have astounded him with "my great understanding" of Indian History.I was flattered and you bet,I have admitted where it all came from.
Special Features = GREAT...PERFECT especially when you see the
real footage of GANDHI when he visited UK with his rather funny clothing. People all around him and he's a bit shy in front of the cameras.
And a lot more...
37 A wonderful movie - a cartoon, but still a wonderful movie
I really love this movie -- for its cinematic effects, its terrific acting, even the editing which has sometimes been called too slow. I love it that India is recognizable in the movie, even seen through an Anglicized lens. And I'm also partial to the portrait of the Mahatma that Attenborough painted (and Ben Kingsley brought so inimitably to life). One can hardly escape being deeply moved by the story. In short, it's a masterpiece.
But the reviewers who claim this movie is a history lesson would maybe do well to read a little Indian history: this movie, beloved as it is, is a cartoon. Gandhi comes across as much more appealingly ecumenical here than he was in real life; it's obviously a movie made by and primarily for Christians, who might have felt alienated having to learn about the complicated Hindu principles of self-discipline and virtue that Gandhi's politics were built on. Jinnah is rendered as a vampire (which, depending on the viewer's politics, may well be a plausible caricature -- I found it thrilling, and unusual given the British & American alliance with Pakistan against India for most of the duration of the Cold War (and the enduring Western eagerness to buy Jinnah's contradictory argument, both in the Subcontinent and elsewhere, that minorities must be provided with states in which they are majorities if their rights are to be protected under democratic regimes)). Nearly all the British characters are extreme archetypes, not at all whole believable people (even Mountbatten, who might have been so interesting, here comes across as a dashing diplomatic cypher); and the Mahatma's enemies are all really deliciously evil and ugly. Any sane person can hardly escape feeling at the end that Gandhi was a saint, and while this is a really pleasant feeling to nurture I'm not sure it's entirely historically fair.
Still -- I give it 5 stars. How could I not?
I recommend the DVD over the VHS version, too, for the benefit of the intermission music, which one loses in the two-tape VHS format. The chapter headings are a little weird, but this is minor.
38 Incredible Perspective on Film!!
Okay, so Ben Kingsley is not "Gandhi," but after you get into the film, you may be convinced that he is. The make-up and the shots of India are so incredible, and his performance as the Indian holy man are uncanny. Richard Attenborough has put together such an astounding resemblance to the man who shaped our world that it is close to being real on its own.
Then there are the performances of John Gieglud as the "authority" figures, and the supporting cast of "thousands," literally, is phenomenal. Gandhi's family, of course, don't want him to push things, but the film chronicles his early rise to that of his stature, and the scenes of his starvation diets to press home his political points are so appropriate for the time in which we live, and we can see how Martin Luther King Jr. was so taken with him.
This may not be exactly the history books, but it is a nice addition to whatever history you may have or remember. For the novice who knows nothing about Gandhi, this is a nice place to start. Recommended!!
39 Ben Kingsley's greatest role.
"Gandhi" is one of the best movies ever made. Ben Kingsley is in his perfect role as Mohandas K. "Mahatma" Gandhi, who was originally a lawyer, and later an Indian political leader, who was into non-violent beliefs. This movie is the winner of 8 well-deserved Academy Awards including Best Picture, Best Actor (Kingsley), and Best Director (Richard Attenborough). The DVD is a must.
40 A Great Soul's Life.
It all began simple enough - with the purchase of a first class train ticket by Mr. Mohandas Gandhi, Esq., recently arrived in South Africa, and unaware that as an Indian, he was required to travel third class and not entitled to such a ticket. Literally thrown off the train for his transgression, the young attorney, embodied to perfection by Ben Kingsley, spent a full night sitting on the platform, musing how best to respond to such discrimination. Shortly thereafter, and after consultations with established members of his community, he wrote his first treatises and organized his first demonstrations. And when participants of a protest assembly stood up and proclaimed their willingness to die in the fight against suppression, Gandhi once and for all formulated his doctrine of nonviolent protest: "They may torture my body, break my bones; even kill me. Then they will have my dead body - not my obedience."
Shot largely on four Indian locations, Richard Attenborough's nine-time Oscar-winning biography of Gandhi is a sweeping epic that takes the viewer back to Britain's colonial past, covering all major events of Gandhi's political career from its beginnings in South Africa to the March to the Sea and India's independence, and contrasting the luxurious lifestyle of the foreign rulers with the poverty of those they governed; that India which, as Gandhi soon realized, not only the British didn't understand, but whose population also could not have cared less about the activities of the Indian Congress Party, at the time little more than a group of well-to-do city dwellers mentally and socially almost as far removed from the rest of their country as the British. Twenty years in the making, the movie is clearly reverential of Gandhi's genius, and of the man whose symbolic growth was reverse parallel to his retreat into simplicity, and who for that very reason, and because of his unfaltering commitment to nonviolence on the one hand and India's independence on the other hand, accomplished what only few people would otherwise have thought possible: to convince the world's biggest colonial power to give up the crown jewel among its colonies; and to do so in a gesture of friendship and without civil war. The one aspect of Gandhi's life that falls a bit short here is the effect that his overbearing symbolic status had on his family life, which necessarily had to suffer as a result (unable to cope with his father's fame and chosen lifestyle, Gandhi's eldest son, for example, threw himself into a life of alcoholism and prostitution). But Gandhi is not depicted as a saint, and particularly during his early years, we learn about the struggle that went into the formation of the man who later earned the title "Great Soul" (Mahatma). Even anticipating that he might be killed by an assassin's bullet, Gandhi once said that he would only deserve that title if he could accept that bullet with Rama's (God's) name on his lips: fittingly, the movie begins with his assassination and comes full circle at the end, affirming that Gandhi truly was a Great Soul throughout.
Attenborough found his perfect Gandhi in Ben Kingsley, who not so much plays but truly *is* the Mahatma; from his appearance to the inflection of his voice, attitudes and gestures. Over the year-long struggles to finance the movie, Attenborough's first choices for the role had grown too old to convincingly play the young Gandhi in South Africa, but eventually Michael Attenborough pointed his father to Kingsley, then with the Royal Shakespeare Company, who reportedly won the role by meeting Attenborough in full Gandhi makeup at their first get-together, thus instantly convincing him that he had found his man. Yet, despite his gift for mimicry and his part-Indian heritage, Kingsley nevertheless turned to his Indian costars, particularly Rohini Hattangadi, who plays Gandhi's wife Kasturba, to fine-tune his portrayal; and he recalls in an interview for the movie's DVD release that the skill he found the most difficult to master was to spin and to talk at the same time. The use of the actual British newsreels covering Gandhi's visit to England adds to the movie's sense of authenticity - and emphasizes yet again Ben Kingsley's achievement in transforming himself into the Mahatma.
In fact, his awardwinning performance so overshadows every other actor in the movie that it would be easy to overlook the fine performances of his costars, all of whom contributed to the movie's unique quality - to name but a few, Sir John Gielgud, whom Kingsley praises as "a national treasure" (British viceroy Lord Irwin), Roshan Seth (Pandit Nehru), Martin Sheen (NY Times reporter Vincent Walker), Candice Bergen (People Magazine's Margaret Bourke-White), Ian Charleson (Gandhi's early friend and colaborator Reverend Andrews), Edward Fox (General Dyer, the man responsible for the massacre at Amritsar, who testified at his court-martial that his intention had been to "teach a lesson that would be heard throughout India"); and Trevor Howard as Judge Broomfield, who had to sentence Gandhi to prison for his outright admission that he was guilty of the charge of advocating sedition because of his belief "that non-cooperation with evil is a duty and British rule in India is evil," and who nevertheless rose at Gandhi's entrance into the courtroom instead of making the prisoner rise for him, and commented on the sentence he had to impose that "if ... his Majesty's government should, at some later date, see fit to reduce the term, no one will be better pleased than I."
The movie ends with Gandhi's affirmation that when he despaired, he remembered that "all through history, the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants and murderers; for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of this: Always." Such a belief may be difficult to hold on to, particularly for us who are so much more fallible than the Mahatma. Yet, this movie eloquently pleads that it is, at least, worth our very best effort.
41 More Than A History Lesson
In a stunning performance, Ben Kingsley stars as the famed Indian leader who showed the world that non-violent resistance was an alternative (and better) way to bringing about change and political justice. From his rise to prominence in South Africa, fighting against unfair racial laws, to his role in bringing about the independence of India from England, Gandhi stood firm with his ideals and maintained a simple life. Director Richard Attenborough fills Gandhi's story with beautiful visuals, yet doesn't shy away from presenting the brutality of violence that Gandhi tried to avoid and end. Kingsley is simply amazing in the lead, seemingly inhabiting the body of his character. The supporting Western cast are often little more than cameos, well done although not necessary, and the Indian cast are excellent. The pace is a little too slow at times, but the film is rich in atmosphere and the photography is beautiful. I knew very little about the life of Gandhi prior to viewing this film, and I come away with a knowledge of who he was and an appreciation and respect for what he stood for. Once again, I am reminded of how the actions of one man can affect the world and the power of standing by what one believes in.
42 Gandhi Inspires....Attenborough Delivers Excellence
Students of history and film alike can well appreciate this great piece of filmmaking about a truly great historical figure.
It took Director/Producer Richard Attenborough 20 years to put the life work of Mohandas K. Gandhi on film. The picture among it's many international awards was also winner of 9 well deserved Academy Awards. Among them, Best Picture(1982),Best Actor(Ben Kingsley),Best Cinematography,Best Screnplay, and Best Director.
The "Mahatma"(Great Soul) as Gandhi was called by his followers,devoted his life to secure freedom for the people of his country, India. From the time as a young attorney, traveling through S. Africa, where he was literally thrown off a train due to his race, until his death by assassination,he led his people with hope and strong beliefs.The British Monarch ruled the nation of India, and treated the citizens as second class. Gandhi would change all that through the means of peaceful civil disobedience, often leading to beatings, imprisoment or both for all that particapted in these demonstrations.In one particular case, even more tragic, gunfire was opened on 15,000 men women and children gathered in rally, many were killed.Gandhi's answer was not revenge however, he felt that if "every man took an eye for an eye, the whole world would be blind."
The film also depicts the famous "March to The Sea", when Gandhi led thousands, to show the British that the salt(an important commidity to them) belonged to everyone,the hunger strikes he went on, and finally the respect earned him by even the British.
Reporters from around the world eventually learned of this great man and flocked to get his story.It follows through on the time after India gained it's Independence from England, and began to have civil probelms of it's own, with conflicts arising between the Muslims, and the Hindu. Again Gandhi would go on hunger strikes to bring peace to his nation.And finally his assassination which stunned the world, that this great man of peace would have his life ended so violently.The funeral scene is a sight to behold.
The film is extraordinary. The cinematography(Filmed mostly in India), the costumes designs, the acting, will all keep you totaly involved with this story of historical importance. Performances by Ben Kingsley, Martin Sheen,Candace Bergen, Sir John Gielgud, Trevor Howard and Edward Fox were all a stroke a brillant casting.Also look for a very young Daniel Day Lewis early on in the film. The music by Ravi Shankar and George Fenton(also given a nod by the academy) encompasses the true culture of India.
The DVD enhances all of the terrific qualities of the film. The widescreen(2.35:1) is perfect. The picture quality and colors clear and vibrant. Sound and dialouge excellent as well. Columbia/Tri-Star has given this important film the treatment it deserves. There are also some great extras. Ben Kingsley talks about Ghandi and how he got into character, there is some original newsreel footage of Ghandi(watch this and you will realize what a remarkable job Kingsley has done), there's a photo montage, and several langauge subtitles(No Indian languages though,.. hmmm???).All together a great DVD.
This is a film that truly deserved all the awards it was bestowed, and it is one that is educational as well as enjoyable....so enjoy.....Laurie
43 This epic classic is even better on DVD. Don't miss it!
This magnificent film has a cast of thousands as it was was produced before digitizing later became common practice. It was filmed on location in India and starred Ben Kingsley as Gandhi. Of course he had to lose weight, and he did have to maintain a suntan. But in spite of being English and not Indian, he sure did look like Gandhi. And during the course of the film, he just melted right into the character of this very special man he was portraying. The supporting cast was wonderful too and included Candice Bergen, John Gielgud, Trevor Howard, Martin Sheen and Om Puri.
The film covers more half a century, beginning in 1893 in South Africa when Gandhi, an attorney educated in England, is treated like a second-class citizen. Always, he yearned for freedom for his people from British rule. And always, he preached non-violence. It worked. Eventually India did become independent. And, later, when the tension mounted between Muslims and Hindus, and blood began to be shed, Mahatma Gandhi's hunger strike was able to stop the fighting.
Watching the film on DVD is a special treat because it included some original newsreel footage of Gandhi himself as well as a recent interview with Ben Kingsley, who is now in his late fifties. I love all those behind-the-scene stories, such as how he had to learn to spin fabric as part of his role and how difficult it was for him to spin and say his lines at the same time. Also, in the funeral scene, which included 400,000 people, he actually played the part of the corpse instead of using a wax dummy.
I definitely recommend this DVD. See it for the great performances. See it for a sense of history. And see it as a moral lesson in what is possible.
44 Can't imagine a better biography!
.
You probably already have a basic idea of who Gandhi was, and that this film won scads of awards. You may even have seen the movie when it came out in the theatres. Well, it is time you saw it again! It's an appreciative script, wonderfully shot, and excellently portrayed. It conveys the basic tenets of Gandhi's philosphy, and demonstrates the roots of the political schisms that exist today. (Not just re India & Pakistan, but also the imapct of hardliners and what they can cause - - very relevant to Northern Ireland & Israel.)
The scope, given its three hours, is broad enough to start well before India, with Gandhi's early efforts against racist regulations in South Africa and the sacrifices implied by peaceful resistance. The film brings in Gandhi's failures, successes, idealism, and compromises. It also shows his human weaknesses. (I don't agree with others that the portrait is completely saintly.)
The performances are wonderfully understated, not just from Ben Kingsley, but also form the entire cast. And casting was wonderful, not just for the major parts but also the minor ones - - there is a scene late in the movie where a bereaving father visits Gandhi, and the actor who plays him (in even this small role) is just terrific.
One small complaint regarding the DVD. They haven't indexed the scenes as well as they could have. The scene index directly after the "intermission" is after a subsequent, important scene. Thus, if you split your viewing across two nights (it's a three hour movie, so you might), it's not easy to pick up just after the intermission (you either skip the following scene, or have to watch all of the scene before the intermission). It would have been just as easy for them to cut the index so that an index appears -immediately- after the intermission.
45 Outstanding historical piece, wonderfully filmed
I own both VHS and DVD versions of this and it is a movie I recommend often. 99% of the time it is returned with enthusiastic appreciation and comments like "I didn't know that about Indian history. What a story." The only criticism I've heard was "it was too long" but it's a big story and I told those friends to invest their time. They didn't regret it. Richard Attenborough's direction is outstanding, it is beautifully filmed, and you'd swear Ben Kingsley had a special tie with Gandhi to so portray him so well. I believe this is an important movie, particularly for people who haven't had time to read about the history of one of the key parts of our world. The world is a small place and great movies like this serve an important educational role in making us aware of other cultures as well as providing tremendous entertainment. Movie making at it's finest!!
46 Gandhi - the man?
A sprawling, powerful epic about one of the noblest men in history, it ranks alongside Lawrence of Arabia and Patton as one of the most impact-laden biopics ever made. In my humble opinion, it is director Richard Attenborough's most compelling work. The movie traces Gandhi's rise, from humble lawyer in South Africa to the benevolent father of an independent India. It is not the best rendition but it is by far the most inflencial. The movie does seem to have a few flaws - it does try to romanticize and essentialize Gandhi - but what can you expect if you try to encapsulate a man's life in a two to three hour movie. One does, however, have to be self reflective of this process and I think Attenborough is. There is a risk of elevating a man to sainthood - yet I think that in Gandhi's case it would be difficult to downplay his strengths. The movie does go into some detail about how, ironically - India was not the "united" India that Gandhi had in mind. Partitioned into "Hindu" India and "Muslim" Pakistan deadly clashes between Hindus and Muslims cost both groups thousands of lives in 1947. The conflict had its greates casualty as a Hindu extremist killed Gandhi on January 30, 1948. The movie had its work cut out for itself as it tried to bring a "man" into the movie - that has a tendency to make images "larger than life." To give everyone credit, the movie does have a sense of tact to it and Kingsley does well in a career-defining role. If you watch the movie with a sense of cynicism, you might be rewarded - it is full of wonderful images and colors that India is but it will not allow you "break through the veil" - the veil that separates western viewers from flesh and blood discourses around the world. Despite all that, I strongly feel that it should be watched along with other masterpieces like Lawrence of Arabia and Patton (both also available on Amazon.com).
Miguel Llora
47 The worste I've ever seen
This movie is one of the biggest examples of how movies in general can slaughter the events that they are based on. This movie was not made as any tribute, so matter what anyone says. This movie was made to MAKE $$$$$$. That's all.
48 DVD Review.
"Gandhi" is one of my all-time favorite movies! The DVD is great with features! The movie is about the life story of Mahatma Gandhi, an Indian political leader who managed to free his country from the British rule using peaceful means and thus giving hope and inspiration for generations to come. The movie is based on a true story. "Gandhi" is a movie that won 9 Academy Awards including Best Picture, Best Actor Ben Kingsley, and Best Director Richard Attenborough. Excellent!
49 Lesson Learned
Perhaps no historical document on film has such a profound modern political impact as "Gandhi". When you consider the current situation in the Middle-East, nothing in artistic form so broadly displays the roots of its foundation as this film. Directed by Sir Richard Attenborough, and permitted by the government of India, "Gandhi" is singularized by the brilliant performance of Sir Ben Kingsley. Indeed, one of the great film acting performances of all time.
We begin the film journey, for indeed this is quite the epic running over three hours long, in a train car as young Gandhi is headed to South Africa. Unbeknownst to him, dark skinned men are not allowed in first class seats, and since he is a lawyer, and quite accustomed to first-class, he refuses to move. Little do the men who throw him from the train know that they are lighting a fire that would eventually take down an Empire.
...
There are many poignant scenes in Gandhi's struggle on film, one of which is the massacre at Jallianwalla Bagh...The second of which is a demonstration at a Salt Factory, ...
Gandhi is a triumphant picture, which preaches the power of the human spirit and the ability of non-violence to defy the tyrannical and bloodthirsty. Anchored by the brilliant performance of Kingsley, and with the assistance of two American icons in great supporting performances, Martin Sheen and Candice Bergman, as well as the two British legends Sir John Gielgud and Sir Johnny Mills, Gandhi is a feast of the human soul and a wonderful film for dreamers idealists, and lovers of good cinema.
50 Breathtaking! A Masterpiece! Was intrigued by every minute!
Born to be a classic! "GANDHI" is an amazing look into a seemingly ordinary person's life. Yet, when you hear and see of his travels and thoughts, you realize he isn't ordinary because he does extraordinary things. The great thing is how insightful and close this movie brings you to Gandhi's daily life and Ben Kigsley's emotions that he gives to his character bring you close to the pain Gandhi must have gone through. And also as I watched it on the DVD, I was inpired by, not the words Kingsley had learned from a script, but the words of Gandhi and his reasons for doing what he did.
And as the movie ended, with tears in my eyes, I thought about what Albert Einstein said-"Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this ever in flesh and blood walked upon this Earth", but I disagreed because I did believe with all my heart.
I now believe Gandhi lives in all of us. But it still mystifies me how one man can be as fragile as anyone else and yet at the same time be almost as powerful as God himself.
51 Not everyones cup of tea. But wonderful nevertheless.
This is one of the best movies in its category. This is the true story of Ghandi and the role he played in freeing India from the British occupation. Both picture and sound are wonderful.
This is a three hours movie. The pace is slow at times and fast at other times. This is not something to watch while you are reading the paper. This is a movie that requires the viewer to be in the correct frame of mind before begining to view it. Set aside sometime to watch it, and you will not be disappointed.
I must have watched this movie 10 times already, it is that good. The special features are excellent and there are some newsreels of Gandhi himself.
I throughly enjoyed the movie and the DVD and I highly recommend the movie to all people.
52 Best Movie in 20 Years
This movie is a perfect depiction of English Imperialism. For anyone who doesn't know that much about India, Gandhi really fills in the blanks. Also, contrary to one reveiwer, Gandhi IS played by an Indian guy. Ben Kingsley was born Krishna Bhanji.
53 A Gripping Thriller!
Gandhi is amazing! An action packed adventure that is sure to leave you on the edge of your seat. If you want a sleeper of a movie, stop reading and look somewhere else. Gandhi has it all- romance, death, adventure, action, drama, struggle, and modern effects. WELL WORTH THE HOURS! Once you start you can not let it go!
54 Noble, Nobel Biography with Unjust Crediting
It's a shame to start off a review of such a crucially important film and story with superficialities, but I have to mention right off the bat that this is the most attractively packaged DVD I have ever seen. The acetate slip-cover layers so well over the DVD case itself, especially the back-cover with the inset of a smiling Gandhi which layers over the throbbing masses by the train station in India.
Also, the extras in this film are truly phenomenal. The standout: actual footage of Gandhi in the 40s, actual speech by him and actual headlines from newspapers of the time. Not only does the owner of this DVD get treated to a superb dramatization of one of the most important stories of our time, but they actually get to meet the subject, himself.
EVERYBODY SHOULD SEE THIS MOVIE!!! India is the world's largest democracy, and 2nd most populous country. It has one of the oldest uninterrupted civilizations and has been reponsible for more bodies of knowledge than the West is ready to give it credit for. India's greatest human, Mohandas Gandhi, of the last couple of hundred years or so is a most noble subject. This film wonderfully shows Gandhi's unimaginably unflinching pacificsm and social disobedience which bought India's freedom from the cruel British rule, and it necessarily shows the vast human cost that India paid to gain its rightful independence.
Highlights of this 9-time Academy Award winner are Ben Kingsley's Oscar-winning performance as Gandhi, himself, the wonderful acting jobs of Roshan Seth ("Mississippi Masala", "Monsoon Wedding" - both must sees) as Nehru, the ever-present Indian actors Saeed Jaffrey, Amrish Puri, Om Puri, and Rohini Hattangadi (as Gandhi's wife), and Edward Fox, who did an uncanny job of portraying the indescribably wicked (and brainwashed?) General Dyer, perpetrator of the Amritsar Massacre.
In addition to great acting, some of the most poignant examples of the horrors of India's struggle for her independence, in terms of Indian civilian casualties, are included: the brutalities at the Dharasana salt mine as well as the aforementioned Amritsar Massacre. These two examples show the absolute, unconscionable British brutality. The film also necessarily showed the sad truth: that a people can be bought to oppress their own, and that the divisions within an oppressed people will inevitably flare up to disastrous results once the common oppression is overthrown (see: 200,000 Hindus and Muslims slaughtering each other in communal riots during the actual gaining of independence).
There are a couple of MAJOR gripes with this movie, though, in terms of crediting. Every single actor listed on the case is white (British or American), and every single actor listed in the Filmographies Extra is white. Amazon, themselves, list only British/American actors in the first ten names on "cast list" for this item, despite the fact that all of the major movie-spanning roles, except for that of Gandhi, were played by actual Indians (Roshan Seth, Saeed Jaffrey) who are every bit as accomplished as their American and British counterparts. Another note of outrage is that this movie was filmed in both English and Hindi, yet there is neither Hindi language option nor Hindi subtitle option (nor any other Indian language, for that matter). How sad that the technical features of this movie alienate the people who are the subjects of this movie and how sad it is that the people trying to sell it to you right now only further perpetuate the malappropriation of credit.
55 The Mahatma would not be pleased
While 'Gandhi' the DVD is certainly one of the most visually beautiful packages I have ever seen, it is also a sad commentary on the ultimate impact this movie has made on Western studios (read : nothing). The DVD comes in a see through white plastic case, with a clear band window running on either side. This lets us catch a glance of the real case cover, which has Gandhi in white, illuminated by the multitudes of men chanting beside him and around him. When you slip the case out of its' plastic holder, you are treated to the fuller version of the same picture, which, with the wonders of Adobe Photoshop, have rendered what was once just another studio shot of Ben Kingsley as Gandhi, into something far more magical and memorable.
All the details of the DVD are listed on the back of the white plastic case. The actual DVD case itself is in a wonderfully regal dark gold color, and the back picture is of the train sequence, with the words "Be the change you wish to see" beautifully etched across the skyline. Indeed, I have never come across a packaging for a disc that has so aptly captured the film's sentiment. On this front, I give the disc a full five stars.
However, the DVD itself smacks of hypocrisy. I find that everytime a reviewer gives this disc a low star rating due to the fact that the DVD blatantly insults the fact that Gandhi spoke Hindi and that all the main actors (save for Ben) were Indian, people are quick to claim that the review was 'not useful'. I am not sure why this is, but the truth is that this is very much an Indian film, with all the important roles played by Indian actors, and yet there is not ONE mention of ANY of their names on the DVD packaging. Candice Bergen, who appears for just eight minutes on screen, is given prime billing next to Ben Kingsley, while Rohini Hattangady, a beautiful Indian actress who plays the Mahatma's wife and was onscreen for most of the three hour film, is not mentioned even once on the DVD.
When you click on 'Cast and Crew', it is even more horrifying. Not even ONE of the actors mentioned are Indian. ALL of the actors listed are white. The great Alyque Padamsee who played Jinnah, the wonderful Roshan Seth who played Nehru, the incredibly talented Saeed Jaffrey who played Sardar Patel - all of them are not even mentioned ONCE. Considering that they appear throughout the film, this is a horrendous insult to the Indian film crew. However, consider it typical American studio idiocy, for Martin Sheen and Trevor Howard (both of whom pop up at the beginning and the next-to-end) get full page biographies and filmographies. This is intolerable.
This is especially disturbing, because this is exactly the sort of vapid Western-minded stupidity and xenophobia that Mahatma Gandhi fought against. Any self-respecting Indian would flush this occidental abomination down the drain. To add to the insult, the DVD does not even bother to mention that 'Gandhi' was shot simultaneously in English and Hindi. The Hindi version was the one released to millions of people in India, and the one that plays on Indian national television to this day. Considering that Gandhi spoke Hindi, and willfully strove to ignore English toward the most epic years of his life, the DVD literally slaps his message in the face by not including a Hindi language audio track. Yet, we get French and Spanish audio tracks, as if that were any consolation.
I was also dismayed and rather angered when I realized that there wasn't even a Hindi language subtitle option available. If the studio intended this as a DVD release for Caucasian audiences alone, I would understand. But yet they include obscure subtitles such as Thai and Korean, which makes the whole thing even more perplexing.
In the end, I think the 'Gandhi' DVD is a perfect example of how one should not judge a book by its' cover. This DVD is a glorious example of Western corporate ignorance and greed, and how the most beautiful cinematic achievements can die a gruesome death when handed over to the studios they were made under. I personally call for a boycott of this DVD until serious repairs are made. And if you're really interested in watching this film as it was intended, try to get your hands on the original Hindi version of the movie with English subtitles. That is the only version the poor Indian woman working in the fields, for whom Gandhi fought for, has watched.
56 A must have DVD for your collection
Certainly a true testament to the human spirit. One would have to have lived in a cave to have not known about Ghandi. Ben Kingsley does an extremely good job at capture history of this great man. Highly recommend
57 An Epic!
Gandhi was certainly amoung the greatest men of the last century. This film not only portrays this great man's life, but it looks deeper into the emotions and beliefs that he possesed. Scenes such as the massacre of thousands of innocent indians and the March to the Sea are fantastic and truely show the essence of the conflict. When Gandhi is forced to accept the breakup of India and Pakistan, you can feel the overwhelming emotion of the man. It is unbelievable that a man such as Mahatma Gandhi ever lived in this world.
58 The Most Important True Story Ever Told
What can you say about such a great man. The only time in human history where a nonviolent "war" of this magnatude has been waged against it's oppressors. Not only that, but he succeeded in winning the struggle when the english finnally realized that their violent agression towards the Indians in exchange for their nonviolent resistance was an inhumane act. Gandhi has shown us proof, by gaining India it's independence, that compassion can conquir corruption and right can defeat might.
59 Outstanding! Fabulous!
I hadn't seen this movie since its theatrical release in '82. It was powerful movie then. If anything the relevance, power and importance of its message is even greater today. This is a must see!
Gandhi still challenges us to live up to our highest ideals.
It is a three hour movie with an intermission. I'd recommend watching it in two sittings, first night up to the intermission and then come back the next day for the final powerful conclusion.
60 Great DVD but missing information
There is nothing wrong with the quality of this DVD production but the content has made me give it only a 3Star Rating.
I waited a long time for this movie to comeout on DVD, I bought my DVD Player in November of 1998. expecting to get this plus few other movies fairly soon. Finally I got my Gandhi DVD but...
Even though this movie is about a freedom fighter from India and this movies was shot in Hindi/English at the same time. There is no Hindi Track avaiable on this DVD, while you can watch this movie in English, French Spanis with subtitiles in all three formentioned languages, plus Portugese, Chinese, Korean and Thai languages.
Again missed the Hindi?
I wrote a letter to Mr. (Sir in England) Attenborough in this regard but no reply from either him or people who read his fan mail.
How sad a Director which made so much money and fame from this Movie about an Indian Hero, forgot to add the native language of india as an option.
Peace
61 One of the greatest movies ever
I can't describe how utterly beautiful this movie is. The scenary, photogrpaphy and (of course) the subject matter are so captivating it is hard to turn away from this. I think this movie accurately pays homage to one of the greates figures in history. The only thing I would warn is that even "roughnecks" like myself get teary eyed during the movie. It was pretty awkward when my college roomate walked in while I was watching the movie and asked "Are those tears?!?!" In times of chaos and despair this movie stands as a testament to compassion and love.
62 If You're in the Mood for A Global Peace Epic, this is it!
"Gandhi" stands as Richard Attenborough's signature film, a sweeping epic biography of the spiritual giant among men who was Mohatma Gandhi. The film rates 5 stars for all of its cinematic accomplishments, from its stunning cinematography to its colorful palette of costumes, set design and lighting. The film is Oscar worthy, especially Ben Kinglsey's starling transformation as the peace loving hero.
And yet, unlike other testimonials to our other heros and idols, spiritual or otherwise, the film is overly long - at least 30 minutes too long - and will challenge the most committed viewer unless they're trapped in a theater or theater class! Some sequences feel they go on forever, and unnecessarily at that, as time and space interweave with the tale of the Man himself, his humanity, humility, and far-from-humble beginnings. It's a towering film to be sure, but in a soft, unmagnetic way that never shows it's pure unadulterated SOUL. Instead of looking INTO the leader's heart, "Gandhi" looks AT it; instead of bringing us closer to his ultimate message and tactical wisdom, he becomes a caricature a victim of his time and place. Though Kingsley effectively combats the script to ensure his character's humanity comes through, it's a tiresome battle, and I still find the film too dull and flat to recommend as a Must Own. To be sure, if you ARE in the mood for a Global Peace Epic - this is what the doctor ordered.
63 Insulting End Credits
An epic film to be sure, but as noted by several reviewers already, does seem to gloss over many important areas. My problem is that the end credits seem to fly in the face of the film's apparent message. Candace (Murphy Brown) Bergen gets second billing (nearly equal to that of Ben Kingsley) for what was little more than a cameo appearance. At best, it's an insult to a host of talented non-white actors who had much larger roles in the film; at worst, it shows the attitudes predictable of a white director and western production company. They find it easy to praise a man like Gandhi, but in the end they've learned nothing.
64 "Only God decides who goes to hell..."
GANDHI is one of the greatest films ever released in the past twenty years. Mohandes Gandhi'sa life, from a young attorney and on through India's independence from England, is brilliantly captured, with a peformance that is still Ben Kingsley's best one ever. He deservedly won that Oscar he got. One thing I find remarkable about this film is it's ability to be exciting without much action, music, or dialogue. This is a film that I believe people of every religion will enjoy. Hey, I'm a Christian teen, and I find this film to be absolutely incredible! Nobody ever knew that a man of Gandhi's stature could win India it's independence without lifting a hand in anger. Remarkable! Do not miss GANDHI! Once you watch it, yo'll never regret it! Trust me! This one's a keeper! I mean it! Grade: A+
65 Great Film
Excellent film with great performance, as always, by Kingsley. The dvd extras are very good and illuminating. Highly recommend.
66 Lessons in Soul Force
For discussions of the film's cinematic merits, you can read many of the other, fine reviews here. I'd like to speak to the material of the film itself. Though "Ghandi" begins in the 19th century and ends in the first half of the 20th, this is truly a story for the new millenium. The life story of Ghandi is one that could never have been imagined; no one could ever have taken it seriously. No literary character as humble, strong, provocative, courageous, and clever could ever have been accepted. Instead, such a life had to be physically manifested.
Indeed, in the film itself, contemporaries early on could not take Mohandas seriously. Finding him about as threatening as a mosquito, one character quips, "I'm sure the British are shaking in their boots." Yet, shake they did, in response to one whose strength of will and moral rightness ("righteousness" has been too misused to even apply here) moved nations. These qualities, as the film hints in its chronological layout, are not demonstrated quickly. The results they bring are not realized by the next newscast, the next quarter's reports, or even the next State of the Union address. They take time. Fighting an enemy back to its side of an artificial line might seem efficient, but it proves only expedient.
Watch "Ghandi" for lessons in Soul Force. Ben Kingsley performs as if the Cosmos is pouring itself into Ghandi, creating a template for us to model, as Jesus used to be used.
(I wonder what Nelson Mandela thought of the film.)
67 DVD Rating and not the movie rating
I was totally disappointed with the DVD. "Gandhi" is one of my favorite movies. But I was so much disappointed with the DVD that I almost disowned it. It does not have audio or subtitles in Hindi or any other Indian language. Gandhi was a Gujarati (mother tongue: Gujarati) and an Indian (Language: Hindi). The DVD has all sorts of subtitles and languages but does not have any language for Indians. I think the producers of the DVD owed this much to the very Mahatma - and his fellow countrymen - whose life has been depicted in the movie. Such products should not be simply weighed on money and how much revenue the sales would generate. Corporations owe something grander than that.
68 Beyond Excellence
This movie is the translation of Richard Attenborough's incredible understanding of the incredible human being, Gandhi. I have watched this movie more than 10 times trying to do what Richard Attenborough requests us to do in the beginning of the film, that is, "...find one's way to the man's heart...". Every time I see it, I feel so much reverence for the spirit of the man. I am immensely grateful to Richard Attenborough and Ben Kingsley for having brought Gandhi back to life in a lifetime that needs a leader like Gandhi as much as ever before in history. If not for this movie, I would have missed out so much indeed...!
I just bought the DVD and it is great. I only wish there was an interview of Richard Attenborough in the DVD. I can't imagine the DVD being released without Richard Attenborough's thoughts in it as, after all, it was his 20-year long passion that made the movie possible. Ben Kingsley's interview is in it and that's great..!
If another DVD is released with Richard Attenborough's interview in it, I would certainly buy that too...!
69 Kingsley Shines
Richard Attenborough's Gandhi is a loving look at the life of one the biggest figures of the 20th century. Tracing his life from a young man to his final days as the spiritual leader of India, Mr. Attenborough leaves no stone unturned. That's the film's biggest problem, it is long and exhaustive and drags in one too many places. Ben Kingsley is brilliant in the lead role. His transformation from a strong-headed young lawyer to the understanding leader of non-violent resistance is remarkable. Mr. Kingsley won a well-deserved Oscar (though Paul Newman was equally deserving for his role in The Verdict that year) for the role. The film is also quite beautiful to look at as Mr. Attenborough captures the mysticism of India. If one can fight through the over three hours of film, you will have seen a great performance and beautiful vistas. The film predictably swept through the 1982 Oscars (the academy loves factual epics), winning Best Picture, Best Director, as mentioned Best Actor and five other awards.
70 "We must be the change we wish to see."
"Gandhi" is a brilliant encapsulation of the life of the man who must be counted among the greatest, most admirable figures in the history of humankind. Starring Ben Kingsley, Martin Sheen, Candice Bergen, Rohini Hattangady, Roshan Seth, John Gielgud, and Trevor Howard, and directed by Richard Attenborough, this 1982 film is a stunning achievement - without doubt one of the finest biographical epics ever made. It garnered six Academy Awards, including Best Picture; Best Actor (Kingsley); and Best Director (Attenborough). This film beautifully fulfills the goals set out in the film's preface: "...to be faithful in spirit to the record and try to find one's way to the heart of the man..."
As this film demonstrates, Mohandas K. Gandhi, always faithful to his principles of equality, justice, and peace, uses non-violent civil disobedience as a means to gain equality for his nation's oppressed. his weapon. He is repeatedly assaulted by police and is imprisoned - usually on trumped up charges - several times because of his political beliefs and activism. Yet this always gentle and humble gentle man never loses sight of his main goal: helping his people achieve political and economic equality. Although only marginally successful, Gandhi becomes famous throughout the world for his work in South Africa and India.
In this masterfully produced, directed, written, and acted film, the life of Mohandas K. Gandhi is painted against the backdrop of some of the most momentous events in twentieth century Indian history. "Gandhi" shows how the Mahatma (Great Soul) leads a nation of 350 million people to freedom from British colonial rule using non-violent means. We see Gandhi at the outset, making speeches in his low-key style, but even then espousing his clearly defined doctrine of peaceful non-cooperation against a repressive British colonial rule. Contrary to many public perceptions of the man, this film shows that Gandhi was not just a simple, humble man in a loincloth. He was a shrewd, pragmatic man who knew the value of good press in the furtherance of his cause. He knew how to confront his political enemies in ways that got his point across while garnering from his foes a grudging respect.
Throughout all these tumultuous events, Gandhi never wavers from his belief in non-violent civil resistance as a means of achieving justice, equality, and freedom for the Indian nation.
January 30, 1948: a supreme irony: Mohandas K. Gandhi - the man of peace who consistently espouses the dignity of all people; the proponent of non-violence, equality, justice, and peace - is violently gunned down by an assassin working for a fanatic Hindu group.
There are simply not enough superlatives to do adequate justice to "Gandhi." Every aspect of this film is masterfully done! Ben Kingsley's portrayal of Gandhi is one of those singular performances that is so good that it defies description. His meticulous preparation for this part is readily evident in every scene in which he appears. His physical resemblance to the real Gandhi, and the way he mimicked Gandhi's mannerisms, is so realistic as to be positively eerie. Kingsley's performance is always sensitive, even slightly understated. Yet there is always present a powerful intensity that conveys the deep spirituality and integrity of the man he so lovingly portrays.
Other performances, although nowhere near as wide-ranging, are no less outstanding. Among them: John Gielgud as the slighly addled, pompous British viceroy, Lord Irwin; Trevor Howard as the British judge whose respect for defendant Gandhi leads him to rise from his seat in deference to the man he is about to sentence to prison; Roshan Seth as Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, the staunchly loyal disciple and future Indian Prime Minister; and Rohini Hattangady as Gandhi's loving wife.
A NOTE ABOUT THE DVD: "Gandhi," a 20-year old film, was only released on DVD for the first time in October 2001. This a truly magnificent restoration and remastering of this great film! It's the first time that "Gandhi" appears on recorded media in its original 2.35:1 widescreen format. Video and audio quality are both simply outstanding! There are plenty of "extras" included on the DVD, including a "Making of Gandhi" photo montage and several newsreel clips showing Gandhi at several important points in his life.
"Gandhi" is a film that belongs in every movie lover's DVD collection
71 Perfect
This is a great DVD. Includes insights from Ben Kingsley, and original newsreels of Ghandi himself. Everyone who loved the movie and loves India should buy this DVD!
72 Ordinary man - extraordinary determination
A must-see for everyone. Richard Attenborough has captured the fierce determination of Gandhi in showing the world a new way of non-violence. At a personal level, it is a story of austerity, self sacrifice and tremendous courage against daunting odds.
I wish however that the film had covered Gandhi's early struggles in England and South Africa in greater detail. I truly believe that Sir Richard Attenborough can make another movie covering only those early years of Gandhi and it would turn out to be just as remarkable.
73 Beautiful ? Deserved Every Oscar it Received
"Gandhi" is perhaps the most emotionally moving of all epic films. Gorgeous in every respect, the 3+ hours are well paced and it moves to an enthralling climax. The entire cast is amazing--especially Ben Kingsley.
The DVD is very good. The 20 minute interview with Kingsley flies by and the newsreel footage is fascinating. The absence of Richard Attenborough anywhere on the disc is a real shame though. It was his dream to bring "Gandhi" to the screen and his presence is sorely lacking. Hopefully, Columbia will offer a new disc in the near future.
74 Someone to look up to
I have seen this movie twice & I still find it mesmerizing. Those who prefer lighter plot & entertainment will be disappointed for this film is highly historical & quite long, but very interesting for those who could truly appreciate this great man's deeds.
Through him, we have seen that nonviolence non-ccoperation can still succeed in the midst of prejudice & oppression. It may take time but it is worth the wait.
I just hope that all his efforts & sacrifices have not been put to vain. In a chaotic world we all live in, we need more of Gandhi in our midst.
75 Does anyone Know?
WHAT STAYED WITH ME FOR SO LONG AFTER THIS EXCELLENT FILM WAS THE BEAUTIFUL SOUNDTRACK.i'VE SEARCHED AND HAVE HAD NO LUCK FINDING THE CD, IS THERE ANYONE OUT THERE WHO CAN WHO KNOWS WHERE THIS WONDERFUL MUSIC CAN BE FOUND,
JIM
76 wonderful film
this was an exceptional film and one that i hope many people watch, and maybe take to heart what this man did and the way he acted. his actions speak louder than his words did, nonviolence. he was a true christian, muslim, jew, and hindu.
the film does a wonderful job in presenting his life. and the extras are nice. it was nice to see the actual gandhi in the news reel clips they gave us in this disk.
77 An outstanding movie of the peaceful warrior
A wonderful movie this is. Sir Richard Attenborough's 1982 Acadaemy Award Winner for Best movie shows his direction and insight into the first leader of independent India Mohandras Gandhi. The movie is reafirming to those who choose peace and love instead of violence and hatred.
Ben Kingsley gives a convincing and mesmorising portrayal of Mohandas Gandhi, the peaceful warrior. Kingsley rightly deserved the 1982 Oscar for Best Actor. From the moment you first see Gandhi in the movie you forget it is Ben Kingsley playing him, and start to think it is Gandhi. The movie is shot in some beautiful places in India as well as the not so beautiful places such as the riots in the large cities. Either way, the movie gives the important events in the history of India during and after British occupation in an unflinchingly manner.
I consider Mohandras Gandhi a personal hero of mine and his hatred of violence but his refusal to kneel down to racism, opression of the poor and wrong doing in the name of greater empire glory is a message all of humanity should know about. His words and insight are so revelant to the world today even 50 years after his death. This is a movie that captures the insight of Gandhi, it shows the personal struggle of him and the people of India during the time of British occupation and its eventual freedom. Also shown is the tragic conflict at the time between the newly independent India and the new Islamic Nation of Pakistan and what Gandhi tried to do to bring the two cultures together peacefully. Unfortunately today there is still suspicion and hatred between the two nations. But we all should hope that peace will eventually spread throughout the two nations and the world.
What an excellent movie this is and is highly recommended to everyone.
78 Overlong, mediocre art house film
I despise biopics. I really do. They tend to do a few things: allow actors to get lazy by just emulating the famous persons they're playing, grab Oscar noms (and wins) from far more deserving and interesting performances, and they tend to be uninspired as movies, just a vehicle for an astounding performance. Gandhi is such a film. That being said, Ben Kingsley is astounding as the Mahatma, delivering more than just an impersonation, but rather a truly felt performance. However, this movie is one you see once and admire for the technical aspects and the sweeping story and never see again. My advice to you: rent the film, don't buy it.
Now, this film was one of the more erroneous Oscar picks. In the same year, a movie was released that was a breath of fresh air to cinema. That movie, Blade Runner, didn't even receive a nomination for Best Picture, probably because the Academy didn't honor those kinds of films until recently. Blade Runner was thrilling, visionary, a stunning spectacle, but also a very clever story about immortality, perception, reality, and the future. It dared a lot, and it created an utterly compelling future L.A., which was pretty much another character in the movie. Blade Runner was exciting, this movie was an exercise in playing it safe, and it won, of course, because the Academy loves biopics. It kills me. In terms of style, entertainment, and substance, Gandhi loses out to Blade Runner. What the heck are the voters looking for? Anyway, this stodgy, conventional film should please biopic lovers, you demeted preverts.
79 Masterpiece.
This movie won best picture of 1982. Can't remember what the other nominees were but I am quite sure this was the best from 1982. If Ben Kingsley was not around, I really don't think that Richard Attenborough could have made this movie. His resemblance with the real Gandhi is scary. During his interview, he recollected that even family members(who were still alive during filming) approved of his portrayal. It is an important movie that needs to be seen by everyone, especially after the event of Sep 11, 2001. The 190 minutes movie somehow manage to tell us what we need to know about Gandhi. There are some special features on the DVD, which include interview with Ben Kingsley. The DVD picture transfer is good. The Dolby 5.1 is quiet most of the time as this movie is 90% dialogue, but there are some nice left and right separation for the front channel (people moving across the room, vehicles moving from left to right). Overall this is a must buy DVD.
80 Darling......
Half way through this DVD we get an intermission. What are we meant to do, jump up and down yelling "long line Ghanja-di" (or whatever it is) while the drums bang? Go and make some tea? Twiddle our thumbs? It may be authentic, but not needed as we can stop DVD anytime. Moving it on is the tricky bit.
Attenborough has a good eye for widescreen. He's not a great artist, but a good showman. He took broad strokes. Too broad for some. See ex-Goldcrest producer Jake Eberts book 'My Indecision Is Final' for a fascinating behind the scenes look at the production process and distribution deal.
There is also an interview with Kingsley. His praise of Guilgood is over the top. Remember "then we'll deal with the Mahatma" (Dan-dan!) He should have included the anecdote he gave in another interview in which he brilliantly mimics Sir Dickie's conversation with an Indian assistant director. "Darling, have we got clearance for the scene tomorrow?" - "Yes, Dickie." - "Darling, do we have clearance for the scene tomorrow? - "Yes, Dickie." - "Darling, DO we have clearance for tomorrow?" - "No."
81 An epic film in only an above average DVD
I've eagerly waited for this movie to come out on DVD for quite some time. Like many films in Columbia's archives (e.g. Lawrence of Arabia), Gandhi has taken its time to find its way to DVD. As a DVD package, Columbia Tri-Star has done an interesting, yet only minimal job. The Gandhi DVD case comes in a special translucent plastic sleeve with a color photo illustrated Wall Street Journal review insert. Of the DVD extras, of interest is an interview with Ben Kingsley, with his recollections of the production, including many insights into the behind-the-scenes workings and his own methods and feelings about working alongside many of Britain's "Knights of the Cinema" (e.g., Sirs John Gielgud, John Mills, et al). Of historical interest is a collection of period newsreels including one rare recording of the real Gandhi. (A minor embarrassment occurs in the Actor's filmography section where for Trevor Howard a photo of John Mills is displayed!) In comparison with Columbia Tri-Star's special releases of Lawrence of Arabia and Bridge on the River Kwai, this release of Gandhi on DVD pales in comparison. While the inter-option transitions are smoothly animated and the extras earn this DVD a higher ranking than say any of the meager DVD offerings that Paramount has offered to date, what Kingsley himself calls one of the "last epics," Gandhi has only been given "above average" DVD treatment.
82 Begins to give the West an understanding of Gandi
Gandi is grossly misunderstood by most Western people, and is not appreciated for the depth of his personal achievements. This film does a great service in beginning to introduce him to the West.
To be honest, even this epic movie doesn't capture the most important part of his life. It concentrates mostly on the political events and under-emphasises the personal transformation he went through. I recommend you check out "Gandi the Man" by Eknath Easwaran... (ISBN: 0915132974).
83 Misses the mark
I have to say that when I first saw this movie in 1982, I liked it a fair amount. However, since then I read Gandhi's autobiography (The Story of my Experiments with Truth), and when I saw the movie again recently it suffered a lot by comparison. Is it still a good movie? Yes. Does Ben Kingsley deserve praise? Yes. But, and it is a big one, does it capture the essence of Gandhi? and I have to answer NO. I think anyone who reads the book must agree with this.
If you know little about Gandhi or if you just enjoy good acting and if you liked "Lawrence of Arabia" then you will probably like this movie. I understand that to capture a man like Gandhi on film is not a task for the faint-hearted, and Attenborough deserves praise for the effort. I am giving it four stars mainly for that reason. If, after watching the movie, you feel interested in learning more about Gandhi, I urge you very sincerely to borrow or buy a copy of his autobiography.
I do plan to buy the DVD version when it comes out, because I see it includes some rare newsreel footage of the Mahatma.
84 Resistance.
Pauline Kael said something funny about this movie: "When I left the theater after watching *Gandhi*, I felt the same way that the British must have felt after leaving India: exhausted and relieved." Amen, sister. This was a project that Sir Richard Attenborough spent 20 years trying to realize. (Why bother?) It came out in 1982, and, indeed, reflects the style of "epics" that were popular when Mr. Attenborough first conceived this project two decades before: sprawling, massive, dull. In other words, it's a David Lean movie. (Who, btw, was to over-go and correct *Gandhi* with his splendid *A Passage to India*, perhaps his best work.) Don't get me wrong: there are indeed plenty of reasons to make a movie about the Mahatma. I merely observe that laboring to present a solemnly worshipful, sanitized, "official" portrait of the man is not the best reason. Beyond the motives for the movie, it's blandly simple, storywise. Attenborough chose to alternate incessantly between two basic scenes: first, there are Gandhi's policy ideas, commandments, and words of wisdom delivered for our edification -- never subject to debate, incidentally, just simply laid down as THE LAW; followed by merciless beatings and massacres of the Indian people by the British. I do not judge. I merely observe that 3 hours of alternation between speaking and clubbing, pontificating and beating, reveals a profound lack of narrative expertise. However, Ben Kingley's portrayal of the Mahatma is charming, effective, fully worthy of the Oscar he received, and the prime justification for this movie in the first place.
85 Richard Attenborough's Best Movie
'Gandhi' is the most authentic movie I have seen on a political figure's life. The storyline from the beginnings in South Africa right thorugh the independence struggle to the final dramatic moments are all shown in a grandeour rarely seen in movies. The movie keeps the storyline on Gandhi throughout and it makes for more realistic and gripping viewing. Its shows the independence struggle in its full glory. The acting is very realistic, specially by Ben Kingsley and Rohini Hattangadi. The number of Oscars for the movie in most of the categories are a testament to the accuracy and vision of the director in bringing the life and times of Gandhi to the big screen accurately and truthfully.
86 Can't be any better!
This is what I call a classic of all times. It just can't be made any better. I own a VHS copy of it and am waiting for the DVD for two years now. I am sure Columbia will make it as nice as Lawrence of Arabia.
If you are a movie lover and like collecting movies don't waste $4 bucks renting it. Just BUY IT!!!
87 The best film of 1982
Yes this was better than E.T. and Tootsie(although those are also great films). In the great tradition of great movie epics this one runs 200 minutes and every minute is worth savoring. Ben Kingsley gives a brilliant performance as Gandhi, one of the all time great humans. It's beautifully shot throughout and despite knowing the events and the outcomes it is still marvelous to view them. You can also watch this movie a hundred times and not get bored of it.
88 elevating and well-made
This definitely is one of the best films ever made and it should be part of everyone's DVD library. Gandhi was a very special person and his life story, personal philosophy and approach to life are a fountain of wisdom. You can watch this film over and over and each time you learn something new. From technical perspective, the film is well made and the fact that it lasts for almost 3 hours is actually to its advantage. Ben Kingsley's performance is also top-notch. There is no question in my mind whether to recommend this movie or not: GO! Buy it, now!
89 One of the best films of all time
GANDHI
Ben Kinsgley, Candice Bergen, Roshan Seth, Martin Sheen, Rohini Hattangadi, 1982
Synopsis
Life story of India's Mahatmas Gandhi. Originally a lawyer, studied in England then worked in South Africa, he then returned to India and fought a non-violent fight towards India's independence from the British Empire.
My Review
Richard Attenbourough (film maker) had to convince movie companies for 20 years that the life of Mohandas Gandhi was worth telling on the silver screen. It was(!), and it won 9 Academy Awards, including one for him and one for Kingsley's magnificent role as the Mahatma. A remarkable film, showing how one man made simple truth and non-violence more powerful than empires.
90 One man achievement !
GANDHI film is an excellent example of one man's achievement. Every Indian , to that matter everybody should watch this excellently produced movie.
91 Excellent
The movie gives an exceptional potray of Mahatma Gandhi, The father of India.
92 read rushdie's critique
i would absolutely suggest that, if planning to watch GANDHI, read Salman Rushdie's critique of the movie. his arguments are bulletproof and will illustrate faulty points of the movie. see "imaginary homeland" by salman rushdie.
93 Inspirational Film
I viewed this movie as a requirement in my "world studies" class during our unit on British Imperialism. The on-screen representation of Gandhi's personality gave me a finer insight into his motivations and background. One particular element to the story I found fulfilling was the display of younger Gandhi as an educated "British" lawyer. His change in identity was very well portrayed as he grew closer to his people. This video was an absolutely excellent supplement to my studies on Gandhi and imperialism. Gandhi's political success was an awesome sight to see portrayed. The manner in which such a frail old man as Gandhi overpowers an entire empire is nearly miraculous, and his attempts at unifying a very religiously diverse India are noble. Gandhi proved to the world that violence is an unnecessary element to "fighting" for change, and that non-violence can be even more effective. It is not hard to tell why people such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Cesar Chavez, both leaders in civil rights movements, were inspired by the achievements of Gandhi, and modeled their political activism after his non-violent model. I felt that this movie exquisitely portrayed Gandhi's persona, his aspirations, and his accomplishments. I very strongly recommend this film to anyone who wants to know more about Gandhi, and anyone who would like to vicariously witness the spectacular accomplishments of one of the greatest persons in history.
94 silence
to judge this movie is like stating the obvious an infinite amount of times. after watching this movie, one should have a moment of silence. one should cry for the evil of men, one should meditate about peacefulness. who cares if the lighting was warm or if anyone got press for the movie who shouldn't have. one should think to themselves...have i inspired anyone lately?, have i helped anyone lately? have i been peaceful myself lately? have i contributed anything worthwhile to society lately? instead of being a critic, lets be more like gandhi himself.
95 Simply a Masterpiece
Every parent should show their teenage child this movie. It is a movie about what one person achieved during their life. It motivates one by showing step by step in each scene how great accomplishments are made.
Gandhi's work motivated and is still motivating many of the great leaders of the past and present century. The struggles of his life humbles the viewer. His awareness of his destiny gradually overtakes him and those around him.
Richard Attenborough did the world a great service in bringing this story to film. Young adults can learn not only how to weave thread (as one of the everyday chores of life) but also how to dream great dreams and make them come true. GANDHI is a video textbook on how it is done.
96 One of a kind?
I do not expect to see another film like "Gandhi" in my lifetime. The movie sets itself apart from just about all other stories of triumph over oppression by its unflagging commitment to reality. Most filmmakers are more faithful to their points of view than the stories they tell. In contrast, the British who rule India in "Gandhi" are neither buffoons nor cackling villains. This fidelity to story and personality allows viewers to feel as if they are witnessing, first-hand, events that occurred long ago.
When I first saw "Gandhi" at age twelve, I was overwhelmed by the man himself. He represented the best a person could be, better than a saint because anyone in any walk of life could follow his example. Later I realized it wasn't just the power of the story, but also the movie-making itself. The score, on its own, is a masterpiece. The acting, directing, and cinematography are glorious. Sure, it helps to have a compelling story, but Hollywood is littered with lousy movies based on great ideas.
The only failure worth noting is the film's box-office pandering of Candice Bergen as Margaret Bourke-White. Her performance was unobjectionable, but the focus on Bourke-White seemed forced and out of place: here's your glamour, now come see our movie. At the theater, the marquee read, "Ben Kingsley - Candice Bergen - `Gandhi.'" Right. It's a Kingsley/Bergen film.
Oh well, a small price to pay for a once in a lifetime creation.
97 Perfect, just perfect
After Gandhi was assassinated, the writer of his obituary in one of the major American newsmagazines lamented the distortions that were sure to follow. "The prettifiers", as he called them, would efface all the complexity out of Gandhi's life, and turn him into a plaster lawn saint. This film, the fruition of Richard Attenborough's decades-long ambition, is indeed a hagiography, but the Gandhi that emerges is certainly no plaster saint. Ben Kingsley's character develops from outraged citizen of the Empire to non-violent independence activist to the supra-national spiritual sage we think we know and revere.
As in any historical or biographical epic, events are telescoped, implied, or omitted. The closest to dishonesty the film comes is the scene where Gandhi considerately declines to launch protests against the British during the Second World War. In reality, the "Quit India" campaign was launched in 1942, resulting in the immediate arrest of almost the entire Congress leadership. Otherwise, the events are deftly and fairly-enough portrayed. The rift between Nehru and Sardar Patel is implied with an impatient nod. Gandhi's growing political skill is noted by a _sotto voce_ compliment. And so forth.
The big scenes are very big indeed. The Amritsar massacre is the most chilling such movie scene I've ever witnessed. The first riot scene, between the two columns of pathetic refugees, is all the more wrenching because the viewer cannot tell which are Hindu and which are Muslim--a cinematic comment on religious violence.
Everything about the production of the film is great. The lighting is warm and golden outside, with rich earthtones inside. The editing is especially dramatic: the din of the Amritsar massacre cuts abruptly to the grim silence of General Dyer's courtmartial; the peaceful evening sounds of Kasturbai's deathbed are shattered by the engines of Mountbatten's arriving plane. The costumes and ambience for each era are letter-perfect and absorbing, respectively.
Forgive the cliche, but _Gandhi_ is a triumph of the film-maker's art, as Attenborough displays all his chops in paying this loving tribute to the Mahatma. A master's masterpiece, if there ever was one.
98 It DOES open with apologies for omissions & misportrayals!
...I have perused Gandhi's autobiography and, if we give him credit, he WAS an unusually good little boy, and young man. Pretty ignorant otherwise of his life story, I came to the movie as much of a "blank slate" as could be wished...
I thought the development of his character WAS evident, his initial protests based more on principle, and faith in the British legal system, than heartfelt compassion. I also thought the breach between Indian Muslims and Hindus was also faithfully, if briefly, delineated. The film makes it clear, too, that while many Britons were decent and humane, many others were mindless automata blindly serving a system whose humanity they refused to question. I was reminded, particularly after the ghastly massacre of over a thousand non-violently protesting Indians by the British, of the Holocaust. Would Britons have complied had a similar program been initiated in India? One wonders...
The storyline proper starts with Gandhi the lawyer being called "Sammy", and thrown off a train, arriving in South Africa. From here, he decides to campaign against what he considers to be manifest injustice, drawn more and more into the limelight of international notoriety. Gandhi understood that, at root, the British system was INTENDED to be just and that, with the aid of the international press, he could successfully wage a campaign of aggressive passive resistance.
I found it highly amusing as the film went on as this sort of phrase started to become well-worn: "Arrest everyone, but NOT Gandhi!". A great film.
99 Good - but do some history homework first
I like this film in some ways, but there are historical inaccuracies. First, someone mentioned that Kingsley is Indian. This is only partly true, because he is only a quarter Indian. So, there is something to the argument of "why couldnt they find a real Indian Actor?" I think its a fair question.
second - Nehru is seen as defering to Ghandi throughout the film. This is a false portrayal. Nehru had his own fiercly held independent beliefs, and although the two men were friends, they had serious differences over the Mother Cow laws, to name just one example. Nehru was more influenced by Moghul and English culture, and held on to that. Hr even once said that he was probably the last Englishman to rule India. And he never deferred to Gandhi.
Also - this portrayal of Ghandi the saint. In real life, he was complicated. But I guess we are asking too much sometimes when we want film to portray people as morally complicated. The truth is he probably wasnt a very good father. His children hated him. One of them became a muslim because he hated his father so much, and later an alcoholic.
There is much more to this man than meets the eye. So, do yourself a favor. Use this film not as your sole source of knowing about this period of history. After all, you shouldnt rely on film as your only source of understanding history. If you do, your never really going to know anything. So, do yourself a favor and read a few books as well, and you will not have a one-dimensional understanding of history. If you rely on only this film, you remain uninformed.
100 My Vote For The Best Fim Biography Ever Made!
This movie was the realization of a lifetime dream for Sir Richard Attenborough, who finally succeeded in bringing this incredible spectacular to theatrical release in 1982. I was living outside London working for the American Forces in the greater London area at the time, so was thrilled to have the privilege to see this movie in its limited initial release in Britain, and was amazed by its scope, accuracy and integrity in bringing the quite controversial facts surrounding Gandhi's life and politically-motivated assassination to the screen. Ben Kingsley is simply magnificent as the diminutive, principled, and indefatiguable lawyer, humanitarian, and citizen of the world with an uncannily prescient feel for what was possible for a determined and energetic person as well as how to achieve his lofty otherworldly goals right here on earth.
Based on his appraoch here, Attenborough seems to have learned much from such masterful British film-makers as David Lean, for the use of scenery, topography, and natural surrounding of the characters as they wind through the more than 40 years of story line is breath-taking. His methods owe much to the kind of subtle insinuation of the local environment David Lean in particular used so memorably in movies like "Bridge Over The River Kwai" and "Lawrence of Arabia" (see my reviews) in making the scenery more than an incidental player in the storyline. Seeing Gandhi immersed in the incredible multidimensional diversities that were (and are) India helps the viewer as we begin to understand just how incredible his efforts were to unite the country with his strange yet irresistible moral authority, an authority that all of the various factions recognized and respected as the authentic thing.
There is, of course, an immensely talented cast, including Martin Sheen as an American ne
