Kodak Black & White 400 Speed 24 Exposure 35mm Film (3 Pack)

1 Great Film
This film seems a lot better than Kodak Max 400 even though it is basically the same thing (except for the fact that it's black and white). I wouldn't recommend this for proffesionals, but it's great for the average person.

2 All right
I took my first pictures ever using this film and it came out looking all right. I suppose it wasn't crystal clear, but that was probably my fault. I also think it has problems with low light. Is that my fault? Probably. Who knows, it was nice to get it developed at Target, though.

3 Great B&W Film For A Novice
This film worked really well for me when I took my first photography class. The price is right, and it performed well for the weekly asignments given to us in class.

4 B&W With the Convenience of 1 Hour Processing!
Kodak's Black & White + is what is known as a chromogenic black and white film. What this means, when compared to traditional (panchromatic) B&W films is that it can be developed in C-41 (color processing). Given that traditional black and white processing has grown quite expensive and that many photo labs no longer possess the capability to process regular B&W, this film provides exceptional convenience.

I think the other reviewers of this film here have probably lacked experience with this film and its competitors from ILFORD of the UK and Konica of Japan. Yes, there are color shift issues with this film. Much of that depends on the quality of the C-41 processing and the willingness of the technician to spend time with some exposure compensation.

Most color shifts with this film result from the use of color paper. If photos taken with this film are developed using regular B&W paper, then the user will receive true black and white prints. Using color paper often times will result in a slight color shift toward sepia or blue/gray. However, I find the shift toward sepia pleasing to the eye because it lends the picture the air of an old time B&W print that has faded with age. Sepia provides a classical look to monochromatic prints.

Because this film and its competitors use dyes rather than silver halide crystals, it is capable of being developed by normal 1-hour labs using C-41 processing. This is incredibly convenient and much less expensive than using traditional black and white film and then having to wait for its return if your lab lacks the facilities to do traditional black and white printing.

This is a very fine grained film for its speed. It is also a medium to medium-high contrast film. It delivers very sharp imagery and has served as a very nice platform to re-introduce casual photographers to the elegance and drama of black and white photography.

Yes, traditional black and white is still alive and well. But for less cost and a lot more timeliness, this film offers very sharp imagery to folks who would not normally consider black and white film.

Kodak markets Black and White+ as a consumer grade film. The Professional emulsion of this film is called T400CN and offers the same convenience and cost benefits. Kodak also offers a chromogenic B&W in professional grade among its PORTRA family of films. That film is known as PORTRA 400 and is often used for wedding and portrait work when people choose black and white prints.

Don't underestimate this film. It offers a lot of advantages and the flexibility to shift tonal variations based on the use of color OR black and white paper.

For those considering this film, be aware that all chromogenic films, such as the ones discussed here, as well as the ILFORD and KONICA offerings are ONLY SOLD AS ISO 400 speed films. Despite that medium/fast speed, all are very fine grained films and will provide incredibly sharp images.

I recommend this film and its professional family members.

5 Funny Color
I shot a roll of this film to test how good it worked. When placed next to a conventional process B&W photo. I drew 2 conclusions. The kodak B&W has a finer grain, yet was magenta tinted, sometimes HEAVLY, to the point of being pink. Also, the high contrast you get with conventional B&W was not apparent. It looked like someone hit grayscale in photoshop.

If you want really good B&W from a C41 film, I'd try Kodak TMAX T400CN.

6 Good for B&W print with the flexibility from a color printer
This film is really a good one - I used about 3 rolls of these films and very happy. I have also used Ilford XP2 Super - but, I prefer Kodak film. I had taken several portraits with just home decoration light-stand and desk lamp - the film exposed correctly because of higher ASA. Also, I like the convinience of printing in local shop. The development cost is same as color printing - it is the best way to get B&W print cheap.

7 Nice Film
This is not true black and white film, it is color film with no color... but the results can still be quite nice if you ask the photo lab to print it on true black and white paper. You can have your prints back the back next day or even in 1 hour, depending on the lab. This is much nicer than the hassle of having true black and white sent away while you wait for a week.

8 watch who develops it...
I This is good film if you just want to toy around with B&W, but I wouldn't recommend it for any Professional style photography.

9 print on matte black and white paper
I find this film gives excellent results though, when printed on colour paper, it often gets a slight magenta or cyan tint. For REALLY good results, ask your lab to print on matte black and white paper. ;o)
C

10 B&W for the effort challenged (i.e. 'lazy')
I recently bought a three pack of this stuff (just for grins) and was pretty impressed by the results (despite my bungling - read on).

I had a roll of the stuff loaded and rewound mid-roll as I wanted to shoot some color film (rated at ISO 100). When I loaded the Kodak B&W back in later, I forgot to reset the ISO back to 400. It wasn't until after I finished the roll that I realized my goof (and a good one at that as I had to deliberately override the DX coding in order to do it). Thinking that I everything was hosed - I just had the lab give me negatives (no proof sheet).

I scanned a couple of the images in via a 35mm film scanner and the results were quite usable. This stuff has exposure latitude up the wazoo. I would recommend this stuff to the casual photographer who wants B&W snapshot - but the latitude makes it useless for the serious amateur thinking this to be an alternative to real B&W.

11 overpriced
Found same product for 8.99 instead of 12.99 in Atlanta

12 GREAT FILM
I have used this film on many occasions and had excellent results everytime. Combined with a few filters and your imagination, this film can take you anywhere!

13 Great All Around B&W Photos.
I've used this film in both my fifteen dollar Vivitar point and shoot and my three hundred dollar Canon SLR, and I've been impressed with the prints that this film produces. I use 400 speed film for almost all my photos unless I have a special need for anything else, and the three pack of 24 exposure rolls for thirteen dollars is a good deal generally, unless you can find it on sale. I've found that it also produces especially good portraits and close ups. All in all, this film's output is limited only to the photographer and camera's ability and range.