Compras Nikon Bluetooth |
OVERVIEW
Pros:
-Clear and Sharp Sound
-Dynamic Range
-Easy-to-carry Fold-up Design
-Gold Cord (I think it has one, because it sure looks like it compared to some of my other gold wires)
Cons:
-No Bass
-Clunky to Wear
I had to knock off a star, however, because both pairs have gone bad after a year or so. I don't know if I'm too rough on them, but something eventually seems to come loose inside and the right speaker crackles and cuts out when I move around. I finally had to toss my home pair, and now my current ones are starting to go (which is why I'm poking around in ... reviews for replacements).
In spite of the short lives of the two pairs I've owned, they _have_ brought me much joy, and considering the price, I think I've gotten more than my money's worth out of them.
Buy these, you will not be disapointed.
In terms of sound quality, there aren't a lot of headphones at this price that are better than this one. I'm no audiophile but I'm very satisfied with the sound these produce. These things put out plenty of bass, but still have good sound quality in the mid-range and upper-range. They're also pretty good at eliminating external sounds. Right now I'm listening to music using these headphones and I can't even hear myself type!
If you're looking for decent, low-priced pair of headphones, I'd highly recommend these. But, if you're an audiophile, you might want to look at more advanced models.
If you haven't enjoyed the material in the last few lectures then a career
in chartered accountancy beckons.
-- Advice from the lecturer in the middle of the Stochastic
Systems course.
Fortunately, the responsibility for providing evidence is on the part of
the person making the claim, not the critic. It is not the responsibility
of UFO skeptics to prove that a UFO has never existed, nor is it the
responsibility of paranormal-health-claims skeptics to prove that crystals
or colored lights never healed anyone. The skeptic's role is to point out
claims that are not adequately supported by acceptable evidcence and to
provide plausible alternative explanations that are more in keeping with
the accepted body of scientific evidence.
-- Thomas L. Creed, The Skeptical Inquirer, Vol. XII,
No. 2, pg. 215